Position:

Judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv

Date and place of birth: 

The information is being clarified

Information about relatives:

Anatoly Anatoliyovych of Bilotserkivets - brother, SBU employee.

Vladyslav Olegovych from Bilotserki - Prosecutor, Kyiv Garrison Prosecutor's Office.

Education:

1997 – Kyiv National University named after Taras Shevchenko

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

2003 - part of the case - the judge of the Shevchenkiv District Court of Kyiv

with 2008 was elected to the position of judge of this court for an indefinite period.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

Illegally chose a preventive measure against Antonenko and Kuzmenko in the form of detention.

"Judge Bilotserkivets canceled the appeal hearing on the decision to extend Yulia Kuzmenko's detention until May 30. The court session was postponed to April 28," the court said messages. It is noted that the judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv, Oleg Bilotserkivets, provided the full text of his ruling from April 1 at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, and the case materials have been in the office of the Pechersk Court since Wednesday.

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

The information is being clarified

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

On November 11, 2019, the judge of the Pechersk Court, Oleg Bilotserkivets, sent the head of the GURSMZ, combat general Dmytro Marchenko, to the pre-trial detention center with the possibility of a bail of 76 million 840 thousand hryvnias. Together with him - four more officers of the Main Department of Development and Material Support of the Armed Forces. Details - in "News" materials.

The Pechersk District Court of Kyiv recognized the head of the Anti-Corruption Center Vitaly Shabunina guilty of an administrative offense related to corruption. Judge Oleg Bilotserkivets made the relevant decision on Wednesday, September 30, 2020. Details - in materials.

On May 26, 2010, the judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv, Oleg Bilotserkivets, closed the criminal case against M. Rudkovsky. As the journalists write, at the meeting where the state announced the refusal of charges, the prosecutor was replaced.

 Details - for link.

In November 2015, Udya Bilotserkivets announced his recusal in the case of ex-regional Efremov, who is accused of facilitating the adoption of "dictatorial" laws on January 16. Details - for link.

According to the local news agency "Volyn News", judge Bilotserkivets issued a decree authorizing searches of the premises of the Volyn Regional Council. The searches were conducted as part of a criminal proceeding related to abuse of office by officials of the State Geology and Subsoil Service of Ukraine, who illegally issued special permits for the use of subsoil for the extraction of amber in the territory of the Volyn region. Details – by link

In January 2012, judge Bilotserkivets decided sentence, which sentenced the activists to three years of probation for the protest action near the Eternal Flame in the Park of Eternal Glory. In June 2011, the boys (Kyrylo Babentsov and Bohdan Tytskyi) symbolically fried scrambled eggs on the Eternal Fire, thus protesting against the arrest of Anna Sinkova, who was detained in the pre-trial detention center for three months for similar action, which consisted in expressing disagreement with the fact that natural gas is burned every year to support the fire, the cost of which costs the taxpayers UAH 300,000. per month After the Revolution of Dignity, an individual amnesty was applied to these activists on the basis of of the law of Ukraine "On Amendments to the Law of Ukraine "On the Application of Amnesty in Ukraine" Regarding the Full Rehabilitation of Political Prisoners".

Volodymyr Rysenko, a lawyer of the Kharkiv Anti-Corruption Center and a member of the Public Control Council at NABU, is being searched at his home. The search is being conducted on the basis of the decision of the investigative judge Bilotserkivets of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv dated November 10, 2016. Details - for link.

As specified on the website Finance.ua, judge Bilotserkivets forbade to conduct photo and audio recording of the court session in the case of Elita Center, a construction scam in Kyiv, as a result of which more than one and a half thousand people suffered.

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

The information is being clarified

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

The information is being clarified

Scandals

On April 2, 2014, judge Oleg Bilotserkivets released Volodymyr Halytskyi, the head of the State Employment Center, under arrest. Halytskyi was arrested in 2011. It was the loudest corruption scandal of Yanukovych's time - the arrestee was suspected of systematic bribery in seven areas of activity, confiscating money and 30 kilograms of gold for a total of $7 million. Details - in materials "Our Money".

The judge of the Pechersk District Court of the Ukrainian capital Oleg Bilotserkivets received a prize weapon from the Ministry of Defense exactly one month before closing the case against one of the sons of the dismissed secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine Oleg Gladkovskii (Svynarchuk) Mykhailo. Details - for link.

Judge of the Pechersk District Court Oleg Bilotserkivets avoids the journalists of the "Scheme" program - exactly one day before the deadline for bringing the Deputy Minister of Youth and Sports to administrative responsibility expires Igor Gotsula due to a possible conflict of interest. Not without the participation of judge Oleg Bilotserkivets. After all, in more than two months, the Pechersk court has not held a hearing in this case. It turns out that Ihor Gotsul is not only an official, but also the head of the Athletics Federation of Ukraine, which received the largest sums among all the Federations participating in the experiment - to use budget funds at their own discretion. Details - in materials:

The court returned to the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption the protocol on the conflict of interests of People's Deputy Yevhen Deidey, who, using his powers, turned to the Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko with the question of checking the legality of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau's search of the home and office of Ihor Linchevskyi, a witness in his case about possible illegal enrichment. Such a decision was made on July 3, 2019 by Oleg Bilotserkivets, judge of the Pechersk District Court of the city of Kyiv. Details - in material "Word and Deed".

The Pechersk District Court twice refused to remove the deputy chief of the Poltava Territorial Administration of the State Security Service from his post, who was arrested for bribery. Appropriate decisions January 21 and February 5 decided by judges Roman Novak and Oleg Bilotserkivets, respectively. Details - for link.

The Pechersk District Court of the capital refused the Prosecutor General's Office to seize real estate, which, according to law enforcement officers, was illegally removed from the communal property of Odessa in the period from 2015 to 2017. The decision was made by investigating judge Oleg Bilotserkivets. Details - for link.

Kyivites continue to rally under the walls of the Pechersk District Court, where the meeting on the corruption case with the participation of Valentyn Osypov is supposed to take place. However, it became known that judge Oleg Bilotserkivets, who is supposed to make a decision, urgently went on vacation an hour before the meeting. Details - for link.

Link

https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/294/2003#Text

https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/596-17#Text

https://declarations.com.ua/declaration/vulyk_78_26

Declaration for 2016

Declaration for 2017

Declaration for 2018

Declaration for 2019

Declaration for 2020

Declaration for 2021

Declaration for 2022

Declaration for 2023

https://hcj.gov.ua/doc/doc/1318

https://far.chesno.org/person/1664/

https://chesnosud.org/judges/bilotserkivets-oleg-anatoliyovich/#additionally

https://prosud.info/#/judges/bilocerkivec_oleg_anatoliyovich

mass media about:

Schemes. Judge Oleg Bilotserkivets saves Igor Gotsul from responsibility

THE JUDGE WHO ISSUED THE RESOLUTION FOR A SEARCH IN THE REGION, BROKE THE CASE OF A MULTI-MILLION BRIBE

Judge Bilotserkivets, who issued the order to search Rysenko, is involved in the investigations of the Kharkiv Anti-Corruption Center, where he works, - Hrytsenko

The court did not punish the deputy minister who spent millions past Prozorro

Not only "n**er": what other "blunders" did Ukrainian judges make and in what spicy situations did they find themselves

The head of the DBR Truba and judge Bilotserkivets constantly visit the elite brothels of Kyiv

THE JUDGE CLOSED THE CASE AND "SENT THE GUILTY TO THE HELL", AND THE VP DID NOT SEE ANY PROBLEMS IN THIS

Position: judge of the Pechersk district court Kyiv.

---

Date and place of birth: March 2, 1978., m. Berdyansk, Zaporizhzhia region.

---

Information about relatives:

In accordance with declaration of family ties of the judge for 2015-2019:

1. Vovk Ksenia Mykhailivna (wife of a judge) - from 2013 to 2017 worked in the staff of the Supreme Court of Ukraine.
2. Fyodor Mykhailovych Tatarchuk (brother of the judge's wife) - worked as a senior official in the Department of Internal Security of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, since 2013 he has been practicing law. 
3. Tatarchuk Ivan Mykhailovych (brother of the judge's wife) - since 2017 - assistant to the judge of the patronage service of the department of ensuring the work of the first court chamber of the secretariat of the civil court of cassation of the Supreme Court. Until now, since 2012, he held various positions in the apparatus of the Higher Specialized Court of Ukraine for consideration of civil and criminal cases.

---

Education:

• IN 2000 graduated from Odesa University named after Mechnikov, in 2001 he obtained the qualification of master of law at the same university.
• IN 2014 graduated from the Interregional Academy of Personnel Management.

---

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

• IN 2006 by decree of the President V. Yushchenko appointed as a judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv.
• In 2011 Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada elected as a judge indefinitely.

---

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

The case of Sheremet - judge of the Pechersk district court Kyiv.

The case "Kolomoiskyi v. Ukraine"

---

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

On September 2, 2020, he passed a decision on compulsory collection of almost 10 billion hryvnias from the state commercial bank "Privatbank" in favor of the companies of the Surkis brothers.

He authorized the detention of Antonenko and Kuzmenko. Responsible for choosing a preventive measure against Antonenko and Kuzmenko in the form of detention without reliable evidence, and house arrest for Yani Dugar. Gave an unreasonable permission to search Yana Dugar's home.

---

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

As are reported "Our money", in April 2011, Judge Vovk was a member of the panel of judges passed the verdict found the employees of the State Employment Center guilty of receiving a bribe and replaced the punishment with a probationary term for 2 years.
As point out "Our money", this case related to the situation when the director of the State Employment Center, Volodymyr Halytskyi, was detained on suspicion of systematic bribery seven directions activity, seizing money and 30 kilograms of gold for a total amount of $7 million during the arrest. His employees were listed as co-participants in the mentioned criminal proceedings and appeared as transmitters/receivers/custodians of money.
It is noteworthy that, despite bringing the center's employees to criminal liability, the panel of judges decided to return the property seized from them to the officials: the head of the department received a Swiss watch "Rado", mobile phones, the seizure was lifted from the land plots and the residential building, 26 thousand UAH were returned. and $5 thousand, which were removed from the official office, and 1.9 million hryvnias, 200 thousand euros and 300 pounds sterling, which were in his bank box. The court returned to the secretary $27 thousand and 10 thousand UAH, seized during the search of the apartment, as well as $43 thousand and 1 thousand UAH, which were seized in the official office. The court returned to the driver $50 thousand that were in his bank box, as well as $1802, 1336 hryvnias. and 1,750 Russian rubles seized during a personal search and two cars, a residential building and an apartment were seized.

In 2012, the former acting Minister of Defense Valery Ivashchenko was sentenced to 5 years in prison. Such a decision was made on Thursday by the judge of the Pechersk District Court, Serhiy Vovk.
Details - in materials of "Ukrainian Pravda".
In the resolution of the European Parliament dated 14.05.2012 p. Ivashchenko was recognized as convicted for political reasons.

In 2012, ex-Minister of Internal Affairs Yury Lutsenko was sentenced to 4 years in prison. The corresponding decision was announced by the judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv, Serhiy Vovk.
More details - in the material of "Ukrainian Pravda".
In the resolutions of the European Parliament from 09.06.2011 p. and from 14.05.2012 p. it was noted that the preliminary report of the Danish Helsinki Committee for Human Rights on the cases of Lutsenko and Korniychuk cited a large number of violations of the European Convention on Human Rights, the trials against other high-ranking officials from the former government are unacceptable and are a manifestation of selective justice, and also expressed concern about the growth of selective persecution of figures of the political opposition in Ukraine and Lutsenko was recognized as having been convicted of political motives.

In 2019, the judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv, Serhiy Vovk, satisfied the lawsuit of former Yanukovych adviser Andrii Portnov for the protection of honor and dignity and decided to collect almost 7 million hryvnias from the state budget in his favor. During the August 2 hearing, Portnova's lawyer stated that the Canadian government continued sanctions against her client based on letters from the prosecutor's office. They allegedly wrote a lie about Portnov's involvement in violations of the law.
More details - in "Investigation-info" material.

On September 2, 2020, Judge Vovk made an "exotic" decision, with which, at an intermediate stage of the process, he satisfied the demands of six British companies of brothers Hryhoriy and Ihor Surkis to write off 350 million US dollars from the state-owned "PrivatBank" in their favor, even without winning the entire proceedings on the merits. "PrivatBank" claims that the plaintiffs used the so-called "fan" scheme to bypass the automatic system of distributing cases among judges: the Surkis companies submitted three almost identical applications at the same time, after which they withdrew two of them, leaving only the one that was considered by Vovka. At that time, he had another, related case under consideration.
More details - for link

---

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

In 2009, the Kyiv prosecutor's office opened a criminal case against Vovka for forging and using a forged court decision, stealing a civil case and fraudulently taking possession of a 70-hectare plot of land. The corresponding decision was made as a result of the review of the court's activities.
"In particular, it was established that the judge of the Pechersk District Court S. Vovk, in violation of the requirements of the law, issued a decision by which he recognized the ownership right of 0.10 hectares for each plaintiff (a total of 4.3 hectares) on French Boulevard in the city of Odessa" , - said Moskal.
"At the same time, the judge, exceeding his official powers, without reference to the norms of substantive law, illegally changed the purpose of the land from recreational to land for the construction and maintenance of a residential building and farm buildings and structures," the deputy claims.
More details - in materials of the "Ukrainian Week" publication.

After the Revolution, the dignity of the Wolf was announced suspicion in the adoption of a known unjust decision, by which he took the car and apartment from the citizen in absentia. However, in January 2020, the Vyshgorod District Court of the Kyiv Region declared him innocent and acquitted the judge.
More details - in materials of "Ukrainian Pravda".

Investigative Department of the Prosecutor's Office of the city of Kyiv in June 2015, the pre-trial investigation in the criminal proceedings against the judge of the Pechersk District Court of the capital Serhiy Vovka was completed. As reported, S. Vovk is suspected of abusing his official position and deliberately violating the requirements of the law, making a knowingly unjust decision in a civil case. By his decision, the judge illegally deprived the citizen of the right of ownership of the property belonging to him. The specified criminal offense is classified under part 2 Art. 375 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (provision of a knowingly unjust decision by a judge). However, the Court of Appeal of the city of Kyiv refused the Kyiv Prosecutor's Office to keep the judge of the Pechersk Court Serhiy Vovka in custody.
Details - for link.
On January 15, 2020, the Vyshgorod District Court of the Kyiv Region found Serhiy Vovka innocent in this case.

The General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine (GPU) has started criminal proceedings against the judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv, Serhii Vovk, for the fact that he unblocked funds from the accounts of the former Minister of Agriculture Mykola Prysiazhniuk. This was stated by the Deputy Prosecutor General of Ukraine, Oleksiy Baganets, reports Espresso.TV.

Journalists of the publication "Ukrainian Week" suspected judge Serhiy Vovka of the inconsistency of the rate of accumulation of property and his income. Yes, it was said that in 2010, the judge, despite not having such a large salary (in 2010, he received 77,290 hryvnias, 6,114 of which was material assistance - about 6,500 hryvnias for monthly expenses), had already managed to earn money for an apartment with an area of 205 square meters, a plot of land with an area of 1,800 square meters, a Ford truck. And also Toyota and Honda cars for the family - in particular, the young wife of the 40-year-old judge, Ksenia Mykhailivna.
The year 2011 brought the honest (at least, more frank than his colleagues when filling out declarations) judge 960 new square meters of "golden" land near the Black Sea in the village of Karolino-Bugaz (Odesa region), 760 "squares" near the same sea in the village of Zatoka (also Odesa), two previously missing apartments in Odesa (24.3 and 177 square meters). He also indicated in the last declaration the tiny premises belonging to his family members in the capital - 13.4 and 9.5 square meters

---

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments

Serhiy Vovka was suspended from work five times, but every time he returned to work at the Pechersk Court of Kyiv.
March 1, 2011 — the Supreme Council of Justice dismissed Vovka from the post of judge of the Pechersk District Court for violating the oath.
March 10, 2015 — At the meeting of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, based on the request of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine a decision was made remove 5 judges from their positions, including Serhiy Vovka.
In February 2016, Vovk returned to work, the GPU appealed to VKKS to remove Vovk from his post.
April 4, 2016 — for by the decision of the Higher Qualification Commission Vovka judges were suspended from work for two months. This was the fifth case of suspension.

---

Scandals

The Pechersk District Court ordered the Prosecutor General's Office to remove from the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations the information about the notice of suspicion to the head of the District Administrative Court, Pavlo Vovka, due to its "improper delivery". After studying the complaint, investigating judge Serhiy Vovk of the Pechersk Court satisfied it and ordered the OGP to exclude the information about the serving of suspicion on the head of the OASK, Pavlo Vovk. He established that the head of the court was improperly served with the suspicion while he was on vacation. Also, the detectives allegedly sent suspicion to Vovka at the wrong address.
Source – material "Word and Deed".

On July 5, the Pecherskyi District Court of Kyiv granted the request of "Privatofis" LLC, related to Ihor Kolomoisky, and lifted the seizure of 415 real estate objects of the company. This is stated in the court decision published in the Unified Register of Court Decisions on July 12, reports "Interfax-Ukraine". The judge came to the conclusion that "the seizure was imposed without evidence of proportionality of the value of the immovable property, on which the seizure was imposed, with the amount of damage caused by the criminal offense," the case file states.

During an unannounced session late on June 6, the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv rejected the request of the investigation to extend the detention period of the main suspect in the organization of the murder of the Berdyan activist, a participant in the hostilities in Donbas, Vitaly "Sarmat" Oleshko - Mykhailo Sigida. Judge Serhiy Vovk decided to release Sigida from custody to house arrest.
More details - Radio Svoboda material.

In December 2020, he praised the decision to transfer the case against the Deputy Head of the Office of the President Oleg Tatarov from the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) to the State Bureau of Investigation (SBI). As noted in the anti-corruption prosecutor's office, judge Vovk, by making such a decision, went beyond the limits of the powers granted to him. The SAP emphasizes that the determination of liability is not the competence of a judge - it can be done by the prosecutor (Part 5 of Article 218 of the Criminal Procedure Code). Also, according to the special prosecutor's office, there is a ban on the transfer of cases investigated by NABU to another law enforcement agency (Part 5 of Article 36 of the Criminal Procedure Code).
More details - in "Investigation-info" material.

---

Link

Vovk Sergey Volodymyrovych (Wikipedia).

Vovk Serhii Volodymyrovych (Chesno).

Declaration for 2015

Declaration for 2019

Declaration for 2021

Declaration for 2022

Declaration for 2023

Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine On granting consent to the detention and arrest (taking into custody) of the judge of the Pechersk District Court of the city of Kyiv Vovka S.V.

mass media about:

Why do scandalous judges Serhiy Vovk and Pavlo Vovk continue to administer justice?

Judge Vovk returned to work.

The Pechersk court ordered the OGP to withdraw information about Vovku's suspicion.

Kafka from the Wolf. PrivatBank almost lost $350 million to the Surkis in the Pechersk court. What's next?

Judge Serhiy Vovk has been making the political weather in Ukraine for the last ten years.

Serhii Vovk: scandals and high-profile cases of the judge who put Antonenko and Kuzmenko in custody.

Scandalous Vovks: what illegal decisions Serhiy Vovk from the Pechersk court is famous for.

---

Position: judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv. On September 12, a body was found in the Kyiv region dead Vitaliy Pysants

Date and place of birth:

01.05.1968

Education:

Yaroslav the Wise National Law Academy (major: law)

Involvement:

Responsible for the unlawful continuation of the detention of the defendants in the Sheremet case without taking into account the defense's evidence, in gross violation of the right to defense.

---

Career:

• in 1998 - 2015 he was a judge of the Sverdlovsk City Court of Luhansk Oblast;
• From 2015 until his death, he worked as a judge of the Pechersky District Court of Kyiv.

---

Biography

According to the site data Fair, from 1998 to 2011, Pysanets Vitaliy Anatolyevich was a judge of the Sverdlovsk City Court of the Luhansk Region (from 2003 elected to the position of judge for an indefinite term). In 2011, his assigned Chairman of the Sverdlovsk City Court of the Luhansk Region.

In 2012, an incident happened to him that became widely publicized: On July 22, unknown persons beat the head of the Sverdlovsk City Court of the Luhansk region, Vitaliy Pysanets.About this wrote many media outlets, indicating that the reason for the attack was “professional activity.” Without specifying what the exact cause was.

According to her, Pysants was taken to a hospital in Sverdlovsk with a fractured skull and severe hemorrhage. Later, he was transferred to intensive care in Luhansk and is in serious condition there. The wife also reported that her son-in-law is in the traumatology department of the Sverdlovsk city hospital with moderate injuries, wrote TSN.

Some The media wrotethat the attack was carried out due to the judge's failure to fulfill certain obligations to the criminal community. Although, in the end, it could have been banal hooliganism related to the behavior of the judge himself, who could feel like the master of the city.

In 2015, by Decree of the President of Ukraine, he was transferred to the most “trump” and influential Kyiv-Pecherský court. Interestingly, the decree is dated April 2015, the judge moved to the territories controlled by Ukraine in the fall of 2014. And before that, did he somehow coexist with the militants and occupiers?

The “Pechersk” period

In January 2019, the Pechersk Court of Kyiv canceled the arrest property of the Dutch company "LVV Administrative Bureau Foundation", which the Prosecutor General's Office links to the fugitive, former Minister of Internal Affairs Vitaly Zakharchenko. This includes 20 land plots, three residential buildings, as well as an apartment in Kyiv and two parking spaces. All this property was arrested in 2014 as part of the case of illegal enrichment and money laundering by Vitaly Zakharchenko. This decision It was Vitaly Pysanets who approved it..

In 2016 he made a similar decision regarding the assets of another fugitive regionalist, Serhiy Arbuzov. And in May 2019 The media reported, that the GPU sees the "interest" of the judge of Pechersk Court of the city of Kyiv Vitaly Pysanets in favor of Oleg Repa - the developer of the scandalous long-term residential complex "Shevchenkivskyi kvartal". As a result, The media called his “handy judge Poroshenko.”

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

Scandals

• in 2020, he rejected the prosecutor's office's request to arrest Interior Ministry employee Artem Yeltsov, who had previously initiated criminal proceedings against participants in the Revolution of Dignity;

• in 2019, canceled the decision to seize the property of a Dutch company Foundation Administrative Office LVV, which the Prosecutor General's Office imposed as part of the investigation into the money laundering case Vitaly Zakharchenko, ex-head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs during the time of Viktor Yanukovych (it was about the arrest of an apartment in Kyiv, three residential buildings in Donetsk, Kyiv and Donetsk regions; 20 land plots). However, later the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv again made an arrest on the property of unnamed foreign companies associated with the former head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (the list was similar - three apartments; six garages in the central part of Kyiv; four residential buildings; 24 land plots);

• in 2018 he was reinstated in his position Kateryna Amosova, rector of the O.O. Bogomolets National Medical University, declared the order of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine on her dismissal illegal and canceled it;

• in 2017, by decision of Vitaliy Pysanets, the Pechersky District Court of Kyiv refused to allow the Prosecutor General's Office to begin an in absentia investigation against Andriy Klyuyev, former Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council and former Head of the Presidential Administration of Yanukovych (among other things, the judge indicated that the information about Klyuyev's stay in the territory of the Russian Federation is an assumption and has not been documented);
• in 2016, granted the request for protection of the former Deputy Prime Minister and former head of the National Bank of Ukraine Sergey Arbuzov in the case of the embezzlement of 220 million hryvnias during the creation of the Bankivske Television channel (lawyers sought access to the decision of the Financial Monitoring Service to freeze transactions on Arbuzov's accounts);
• In 2015, he participated in the selection of a preventive measure for Gennady Korban, the leader of the UKROP party at that time (in a case on a series of charges, including “creation of an organized criminal organization” and “embezzlement, embezzlement of property”).

Link

Judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv found dead: what is known about the death of Vitaliy Pysanets, his judicial career and decisions

Declaration for 2019

Declaration for 2020

mass media about

He considered the cases of Sheremet and Medvedchuk: what is known about Judge Pysants