Київ - Правотворець

Position:

Prosecutor of Kyiv Local Prosecutor's Office No. 6 of Kyiv

Date and place of birth:

The information is being clarified

Information about relatives:

The information is being clarified

Education:

The information is being clarified

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

Until 2016, he probably worked in the prosecutor's offices of the Cherkasy region.

For example, King Artem Oleksandrovych was also listed in the Zvenigorod prosecutor's office (Cherkasy region). – old.gp.gov.ua. This King, by the way, received one of the lowest scores during the test for knowledge of the legislative framework (professional test)

For 2017, there is a declaration by King A.S. - the prosecutor of the Shpolya department of the Smilya local prosecutor's office. There is reason to say that this could be the same person: the dynamics of changes in cash funds of Artem Korol in the declarations of the Smilya prosecutor and the Kyiv prosecutor between 2017 and 2019 gives reason to say that this is the same declarant. In 2017, the King kept UAH 193,400, in 2018 – UAH 250,000, and in 2019 – UAH 300,000 in cash.

Since 2018, he has been a prosecutor of the Kyiv Local Prosecutor's Office No. 6.

King Artem Oleksandrovych was also listed assistant to MP of the 8th convocation from the BPP Maksym Kuriachy, although it was not possible to establish for sure that this is the same person (most likely, we are talking about the full namesake of the prosecutor).

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

member of the group of prosecutors in the Sivoho case

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

The information is being clarified

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

The information is being clarified

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

In the declaration did not indicate the value and date of acquisition of ownership of real estate belonging to his relatives.

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

The information is being clarified

Scandals

The information is being clarified

Link

Declaration for 2021

Declaration for 2022

Declaration for 2023

mass media about:

The information is being clarified

Position:

Judge of the Pechersk district court in the city of Kyiv. Died on September 12, 2021 under unknown circumstances, probably as a result of a drunken fight that occurred on domestic ground.

Date and place of birth:

1.05.1968

Information about relatives:

Kateryna Yuriivna Kolpakova (niece) - from August 2014 to December 31, 2017, she worked as a judge's assistant at the Vasylkivsky District Court of Kyiv Region; before that, she held the position of court session secretary there from July 2014 to August 2014; worked as a judge's assistant from July 2011 to July 2014 in the Court of Appeal of Luhansk Region.

Andriy Oleksandrovych Klyzhko (son-in-law) - from 2012 to December 31, 2017, he worked as a prosecutor in the prosecutor's office of Ukraine.

Pysanets Kyrylo Vitaliyovych (son)

Natalia Ivanovna Pysanets (wife)

Education:

The information is being clarified

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

1998 – 2015 – judge of Sverdlovsk city court of Luhansk region (from 2003 elected to the position of judge indefinitely);

2015 r. - judge of the Pechersk district court of the city of Kyiv.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

Sheremet's case (judge over Yulia Kuzmenko)

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

The information is being clarified

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

1) How reports Public Radio, judge V. A. Pysanets chose a preventive measure in the form of house arrest (from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) in relation to the deputy head of the Department of Preventive Activities of the National Police, Anatoly Seredynskyi. According to the Tyzhden newspaper, according to the investigation, Seredynskyi is involved in obstructing the rallies of Euromaidan activists organized by ex-president Viktor Yanukovych and other high-ranking officials. As noted by Prosecutor General Lutsenko, the obstruction of rallies was manifested in the development of the Cabinet of Ministers' resolutions on granting permission to use grenades produced by the Russian Federation against the participants of peaceful actions in February 2014 and the coordination of security forces during the armed dispersal of protesters on February 18-19, 2014.

2) According to the data Unified State Register of Court Decisions, judge Pysanets on September 20, 2018 made a decision on the renewal of the post of rector of the NMU named after O.O. of Bogomolets Kateryna Amosova and recognized the recognition as illegal and canceled the order of the Ministry of Health on her release.

3) According to information publication "Ukrainian Pravda. Life", on February 20, 2018, Kateryna Amosova was removed from the position of rector during an official inspection in connection with the disruption of the licensed testing "Krok" for dental students. Subsequently, as noted by "Ukrainian Pravda", on March 30, 2018, the Ministry of Health commission recognized the work of the rector of NMU in 2017 as unsatisfactory and recommended terminating the contract with Kateryna Amosova.

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

On January 25, 2017, Judge V. A. Pysanets issued a decision according to which he refused to allow the General Prosecutor's Office to start a special pre-trial (in absentia) investigation against the ex-secretary of the NSDC, former head of the AP Andriy Klyuev, who is suspected of carrying out the illegal instruction of ex-president Viktor Yanukovych regarding the dispersal of Euromaidan activists in the period from November 22 to 29, 2013. As channel 112 reports, on February 28, 2014, Klyuev was declared wanted. At the same time, the SBU established that Klyuyev is in the territory of Russia. As the publication notes "Ukrainian truth", the reason for the refusal was that the Prosecutor General's Office sent Klyuyev a notice of suspicion to the wrong address, the suspect is not wanted in this criminal case, as well as the fact that the information about Klyuyev's stay on the territory of the Russian Federation is an assumption and has not been documented.

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

The information is being clarified

Scandals

According to information "Ukrainian truth”, judge Pysanets on December 26, 2016 canceled the seizure of the funds of Roman Yemelin, who headed the department of the All-Ukrainian Development Bank. Yemelin claimed that he borrowed 3 million dollars from Yashar Khojayev, a resident of Yenakiyiv. According to the information stated in the material, in 2015 the Pechersk court seized these funds due to the fact of illegal lending to regional railways by the bank of ex-president Viktor Yanukovych's son Oleksandr. According to the publication "Ukrainian Pravda", PJSC "All-Ukrainian Bank of Development" belongs to the son of the ex-president Oleksandr Yanukovych. At the same time, according to "Ukrainian Pravda", Yashar Khodzhayev is the person who in 2015 bought the office premises where the Tantalit company was based, which owned Viktor Yanukovych's "Mezhihir" residence.

According to information from the Unified State Register of Court Decisions and material from the Court Reporter publication, on January 30, 2019, the judge The writer made a decision, with which he removed the seizure from the property of the Dutch company "Foundation Administrative Bureau LVV", which was associated with the ex-head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine Vitaliy Zakharchenko. As reported by the publication "Ukrainian Pravda", it is about 20 plots of land, three houses, an apartment and two parking spaces. However, according to the information of the publication "Ukrainian Pravda", already on February 7, 2019, the Pechersk District Court of the city of Kyiv once again seized the property of the specified Dutch company in the context of the case of illegal enrichment and money laundering of the former Minister of Internal Affairs of Ukraine Vitaly Zakharchenko. It was previously reported that the General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine is conducting a pre-trial investigation into the laundering of about 10.34 billion hryvnias through Smartbank by Vitaly Zakharchenko, the former head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs during the presidency of Viktor Yanukovych, and his entourage.

In 2016 made a decision regarding the assets of another regional fugitive, Serhii Arbuzov.

In May 2019 The media reported, that the GPU sees the "interest" of the judge of Pechersk Court of the city of Kyiv Vitaly Pysanets in favor of Oleg Repa - the developer of the scandalous long-term residential complex "Shevchenkivskyi kvartal".

Pechersk Court of Kyiv did not allow to be taken into custody policeman Yeltsov, who initiated criminal proceedings against three participants of the Revolution of Dignity.

Link

HONOR Yatsyn, Burlak, Khoroshevsky and NO. HONOR Pysanets

Declaration for 2020

mass media about:

In Kyiv, the car of a judge from the Luhansk Region was covered in red paint

Schrödinger's Winnie the Pooh in the Cave Court

The court ordered night house arrest of a police officer suspected in the Maidan case

The court did not allow the GPU to start an absentee investigation against Klyuyev

The court canceled the seizure of 15 million dollars from Yanukovych's bank

The court removed the arrest from the property of the ex-head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Zakharchenko

Arbuzov is trying to get hundreds of millions out of custody

The GPU declares the "interest" of the judge of the Pechersk Court of Pysanets in favor of the scandalous developer of Turnip

Position:

Part-time Ambassador of Ukraine to Switzerland and Liechtenstein, Prosecutor General of Ukraine (2020—2022)

Date and place of birth:

September 21, 1978, Kharkiv

Information about relatives:

The husband is Denys Kolesnyk, deputy head of the cyber police department of the National Police. Venediktova's husband was transferred from Kharkiv and promoted to deputy head of the cyber police department shortly after she was elected a People's Deputy of Ukraine and received the position of head of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy. He was also promoted to the rank of colonel

Education:

In 2000, she graduated from the Kharkiv University of Internal Affairs

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

From 2000 to 2004, she was a teacher at the Department of Jurisprudence of the Kharkiv Humanitarian Institute of the People's Ukrainian Academy.

2004 — Associate Professor of the Department of Justice of Kharkiv National University named after Karazin.

2005-2019 — Head of the Department of Civil and Legal Disciplines of Kharkiv University named after V. N. Karazina.

2016-2019 — member of the Scientific Advisory Council at the Supreme Court

In 2018, she was an adviser to Volodymyr Zelenskyi on legal issues. She was a member of the campaign staff of the candidate for the President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyi, and was an expert on the reform of the judicial system.

On July 21, 2019, she was elected a deputy of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine of the 9th convocation on the list of the pro-presidential party "Servant of the People".

August 29, 2019 – Chairman of the Parliamentary Committee on Legal Policy.

December 27, 2019 - acting Director of the State Bureau of Investigation.

Since March 13, 2020, he has been a member of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine.

On March 17, 2020, Iryna Venediktova was appointed Prosecutor General.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

Interferes with the courts to establish manual control over the justice system. Covers the Deputy Head of the Office of the President Oleg Tatarov. Supervises the prosecution of Serhiy Sternenko. Manual courts have been pushing the fabricated Sheremet case for more than a year, as a result of which representatives of the patriotic community, veterans and volunteers are being persecuted.

Advocates the repeal of the law that prevents the prosecution of participants in the Revolution of Dignity

Cooperates with Yanukovych's entourage. In particular, she appointed Oleksandr Babikov, the former lawyer of the fugitive president, as her first deputy.

The Sheremet case is the baseless accusation of Andrii Antonenko, Yulia Kuzmenko, and Yana Dugar for the murder of journalist Pavlo Sheremet. Despite the lack of evidence, Andrii Antonenko has been illegally detained for over a year, Yuliya Kuzmenko is under house arrest, and Yana Dugar is on bail.

The Sternenko case - demanded that activist Serhiy Sternenko be charged with murder for self-defense during an attack on an activist. The courts continue to proceed with the case without sufficient evidence.

After the resignation of Ruslan Ryaboshapka and taking office, he continues to play along with the investigation in his efforts to apply procedural coercion measures to Andrii Antonenko, Yulia Kuzmenko and Yana Dugar in any way.

Also responsible for the persecution of Sternenko, Tamarin, Demidov, Kapli.

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

According to unofficial information, for a long time she blocked the change of the preventive measure against Antonenko and influenced the conviction of Sternenko.

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

Covered the scandalous judge Pavel Vovka. After serving him with the suspicion, she did not apply to the High Council of Justice for removal and the selection of a preventive measure. Venediktova ignored appeals from NABU and SAP on this issue.

Appointed to the position of chief prosecutor of Kyiv Oleg Kiper. Previously, he fell under the law on lustration, because he headed the prosecutor's office during Yanukovych's time, but in 2019 the District Administrative Court of Kyiv recognized Kiper's lustration as groundless.

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

In June 2020, she illegally settled in the state residence designated for the president.

In order to stay on the illegally occupied square, she used her official position to put pressure on the head of the complex. It is believed that the Prosecutor General convinced Prime Minister Shmyhal to change the procedure for leasing presidential facilities. In the declaration, she underestimated the value of the property occupied by her.

According to the NGO "Anti-Corruption Center", he has undeclared property. In particular, a wristwatch worth 10,000 euros.

On May 4, 2020, the NABU opened criminal proceedings against Venediktova, related to possible non-declaration of property.

In December 2020, NABU opened criminal proceedings due to the possible illegal interference of Prosecutor General Iryna Venediktova in the case of Deputy President's Office Oleg Tatarov, which is connected with her decision to change the group of prosecutors in Tatarov's case before NABU detectives planned to inform Tatarov of the suspicion.

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

Open against Venediktova two criminal proceedings (NABU and SAP) for interfering in the case of Oleg Tatarov.

Scandals

In June 2020, she illegally settled in a state residence.

She stated the need to cancel the amnesty for the participants of the Revolution of Dignity. Appointed former lawyer Yanukovych as her first deputy.

Link

Facebook page

Declaration for 2019

https://www.chesno.org/politician/156248

The person responsible for judicial reform in Zelenskyi's team failed the exam for the Supreme Court

Obedient "eye of the sovereign": what will be remembered for Venediktova's first year at the Prosecutor General's Office

mass media about:

Top 5 failures of Venediktova in office

NABU initiated the case due to Venediktova's intervention in Tatarov's case

Corruption scandal with Venediktova

Iryna Venediktova: white spots in the declaration and undisclosed business connections of the family of the new Prosecutor General (investigation)

Position:

Prosecutor of Kyiv Local Prosecutor's Office No. 6 of Kyiv

Date and place of birth:

The information is being clarified

Information about relatives:

Mother - Sydiy Nadiya Teodorivna, an entrepreneur. This is stated in Ucontrol. On her registered several companies at once: She ran for office to the Ivano-Frankivsk Regional Council from the "Our Land" party.

Education:

In 2014, she graduated from the National University "Law Academy of Ukraine named after Yaroslav the Wise"

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

2015-2017 pp. - the prosecutor of the Rohatyn Department of the Tysmenytsia Local Prosecutor's Office.
2017-present - Prosecutor of the Kyiv Local Prosecutor's Office No. 6 of the city of Kyiv.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

supports the public prosecution, signed the suspicion and indictment in the Sivoho case

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

The information is being clarified

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

The information is being clarified

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

She does not own any immovable or valuable movable property, but after 2016, for example, she did not declare the property and cash belonging to her mother and which were indicated in the declarations for previous years (declarations for comparison - see Link).

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

The information is being clarified

Scandals

The information is being clarified

Link

I was born Ukrainian. Paths and destinies of participants

Page on Facebook

mass media about:

The information is being clarified

Position:

former Deputy Prosecutor General of Ukraine

Date and place of birth:

06/5/1958, Khmelnytskyi

Information about relatives:

Viktor Chumak is married. The married couple has two children.

Education:

Kyiv National University named after Taras Shevchenko

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

Chief Military Prosecutor of Ukraine (2019—2020). People's Deputy of the VII and VIII grades. Chairman of the VRU Committee on Combating Organized Crime and Corruption (2012-2014), Deputy Chairman of the same committee (2014-2016), acting Prosecutor General of Ukraine.

Member of the Agency for Prevention of Corruption. In March 2015, he was one of the four official candidates for the position of Director of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine.

Until 2010, he was the director of the Department of Political Analysis and Security of the International Center for Advanced Studies. Areas of specialization: security and defense, law enforcement, constitutional law, administrative law, military law, migration law, customs and border law.

In 1992-2004, he worked in management positions in the State Border Service of Ukraine, in 1981-1992, in command positions in the Armed Forces of the USSR.

Since 2010, he has been the director of the Ukrainian Institute of Public Policy.

On December 12, 2012, he became a People's Deputy of Ukraine of the 7th convocation, running for and being elected from Vitaliy Klitschko's "UDAR" party in single-mandate capital district No. 214.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

In the transcript of the protocol of his interrogation, Oleksiy Yermilov testified that he did consult with then Deputy Prosecutor General Viktor Chumak before giving an alibi, which turned out to be false. Later, this conversation was confirmed by Chumak himself in a comment under the journalist's post on Facebook. It turned out that he was a friend of Yermilov's family and allegedly advised Yermilov to give an interview to journalists if he remembered that Antonenko was with him on the night of the murder of journalist Pavlo Sheremet.

"The witness during the interrogation on January 13 told the investigative authorities that he consulted with the Deputy Prosecutor General about providing information to the police Viktor Chumak. And then the same Chumak extended the term of the pre-trial investigation for another 2 months, when others refused to continue. I think the witness could not directly and frankly say that he was sent by the prosecutor's office. But there can't be such a coincidence,"– explained Andrii Antonenko's lawyer, Stanislav Kulyk.

At the same time, as the witness reported, Antonenko's lawyers were the first to contact him, check his alibi and establish its falsity. Back in August, the defense spoke at the meeting about the verification of Mr. Yermilov's statement and exposed its falsity. In addition, the lawyers never submitted a request either from the defense side or from the suspect himself about the existence of such an "alibi" and did not wish to involve Yermilov as a witness or to question him in court. This information about the false alibi is distributed and constantly speculated on by the prosecutor's office.

And on December 8, 2020, prosecutor Mykhailo Tishin also substantiated the relevance of Antonenko's influence on witnesses with these false testimonies of Yermilov. However, when asked by the judge how exactly Antonenko influenced the witness, the prosecutor did not provide evidence to confirm these words. The prosecutor's office has no confirmation that Yermilov was under the influence of the defense or the accused. By the way, Antonenko's lawyer Stanislav Kulyk stated on February 11 that the witness with a false alibi was sent by the prosecutor's office. Thus, the Prosecutor General's Office created the conditions to still refer to the risk of influence on witnesses, which does not exist. For almost a year now, the Kyiv Court of Appeals has recognized the risk of influencing witnesses as actual, only in view of a false alibi.

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

The information is being clarified

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

The information is being clarified

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

The information is being clarified

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

The information is being clarified

Scandals

The information is being clarified

Link

Declaration for 2019

Declaration for 2020

mass media about:

A witness with a false alibi for Antonenko was sent by the prosecutor's office, lawyer Kulyk

Victor Chumak

Chumak about landing near Zelenskyi, Ilovaisk and witness Poroshenko

Chumak became the deputy prosecutor general

Position:

senior operational officer in the Security Service, investigator of the group of investigators of the Main Investigative Department of the National Police, Dnipro police department of the Main Department of the National Police in the city of Kyiv

Date and place of birth:

The information is being clarified

Information about relatives:

The information is being clarified

Education:

The information is being clarified

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

The information is being clarified

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

The information is being clarified

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

The information is being clarified

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

The information is being clarified

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

The information is being clarified

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

The information is being clarified

Scandals

NGO "Avtomaidan" accused A.O. Podolyak. as one of those involved in fabricating a criminal case against Avtomaidan activists for throwing chicken eggs at People's Deputy Oleg Barna in July 2017.
Details - for link.

Link

https://zaparkanom.com.ua/info/110716-podoliak-andzhey-oleksandrovych

mass media about:

Sheremet's case: The defense is blocking access to the materials.

Position:

Former Deputy Prosecutor General of Ukraine

Date and place of birth:

18.09.1976, Chuguiv, Kharkiv region

Information about relatives:

In 2020, he received an administrative protocol from the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption. On August 17, NAZK announced that it had sent the protocol to the court. Complaint to the prosecutor - filed a declaration late. Symonenko's annual report appeared in the register on June 4, 4 days later than the deadline.
In the declaration for 2019, he indicated that he has three children, but in the declaration for 2018, for some reason, he did not indicate them.

Education:

National Law Academy of Ukraine named after Yaroslav the Wise

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

1998-2006 – intern at the position of assistant prosecutor, assistant prosecutor, investigator of the prosecutor's office of the Vatutinsky district of Kyiv; investigative prosecutor's office of Desnyanskyi and Obolonskyi districts of Kyiv; Art. assistant prosecutor, Art. investigator of the prosecutor's office of the Obolon district of Kyiv.
2006-2010 – investigator in particularly important cases of the investigative department of the investigative department of the prosecutor's office of the Kyiv region; senior assistant prosecutor of the Kyiv region on matters of legal support; head of the investigative department of the investigative department; substitute of the chief, head of the department for supervision of investigations of criminal cases by investigators of the prosecutor's office of the investigative department of the prosecutor's office of the Kyiv region.
2010-2018 – service in the bodies of the SBU.
2018-2020 – SBU, commissioned officer
From March 2020 to January 24, 2023 – Deputy Prosecutor General.

From July 17 to 27, 2022, he performed the duties of the Prosecutor General before the appointment of Andrii Kostin.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

According to the Prosecutor General Venediktova herself, Symonenko is the curator of the Sternenko case (see media about).

Oleksiy Symonenko once distinguished himself in the case of activist and blogger Serhiy Sternenko, to whom the Prosecutor General's Office even before carrying out all examinations within the framework of the investigation was preparing suspicion in the case of his self-defense. As the prosecutor stated during the interrogation in court Andriy Radionov, who handled the Sternenko case in 2020, the Prosecutor General's Office intervened in the investigation and put pressure on him, while no one was looking for the "customers" of the attack. In particular, according to Andrii Rodionov, Oleksiy Symonenko said that this was an instruction from the deputy head of the President's office Smirnov.

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

The information is being clarified

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

In addition to the case of Sternenko, the cases of Sheremet and Kateryna Handzyuk are attached to Simonenko.

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

The information is being clarified

Scandals

By information of "Ukrainian Pravda".", during the times of Viktor Yanukovych, Simonenko received a number of awards both from the then head of the SBU Valery Khoroshkovsky and from Yanukovych himself. Channel 24 calls Simonenko a man of Ihor Kolomoiskyi (however, concrete information confirming the connection between the prosecutor and the oligarch has not yet been found).

Oleksiy Symonenko played a key role in the rescue Oleg Tatarov, deputy head of the president's office, suspected of corruption. In particular, it was he after the illegal decision of the Pechersk Court transferred the Tatarov case from NABU to SBU. Later, the case was closed, just at the height of the fighting for Ukraine, in the spring of 2022.

In December 2021, Oleksiy Simonenko signed the suspicion in treason and facilitating terrorist activities to the fifth president of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko. It is worth noting that the prosecutor is also in the "Peacemaker" base.

"An accomplice in the fabrication of criminal cases against knowingly innocent persons. Complicit in crimes against Ukraine and its citizens. falsification of the so-called evidence base on charges of treason against the President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko", - says Oleksiy Simonenko's profile on "Mirotvorka".

Link

Electronic declaration for 2018
Electronic declaration of a candidate for a position for 2019

mass media about:

Venediktova's team: eternal prosecutors, ghosts of the past and Piskun

The Prosecutor General told why she announced the suspicion against Sternenko

Prosecutor General Venediktova took a fighter with the Maidan and "gifted" Yanukovych as deputies

The case of Deputy Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine Tatarov was transferred from NABU to the SBU

SCANDALOUS PROSECUTOR SIMONENKO CONTINUES TO WORK AT THE OGPU AND RECEIVE A SALARY – DEJURE

Zelensky appointed a new prosecutor: who will replace Venediktova

Position:

At the time of the incident, he was an advisor to the Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine (on a voluntary basis), died

Date and place of birth:

8.021969, Donetsk

Information about relatives:

The information is being clarified

Education:

Donetsk Polytechnic Institute

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

In the late 80s and early 90s, he participated in KVC (Club of the Cheerful and Clever, a Soviet and then Russian humor show).
In 1990, he received the Ostankino Best Showman award.
He was a co-owner and producer of the Donetsk radio station "Mega-Radio". For some time he hosted programs on this radio. He hosted the TV programs "Once a Week" (RTR, TV-6 Moscow), "Bis" (TV-6 Moscow), "How to Become a Star! (1+1, TV-6 Moscow)", "Hidden Camera (1+1 and STS)", "My House on the Edge" on the TV channel "Inter". He participated in the TV shows "Once a Week" and "OSP-Studio".
In 2009-2010, he starred in the humorous program "Na khuhne.tv".
During 2011-2013, he was the creative producer of the program "The Big Difference in Ukrainian".
In the same year, he was the captain of the Inter TV channel team in the project "What? Where? When?" and the host of the program "Plucked from the Crowd" on the same channel.
In 2015-2017 and 2019, he was a member of the jury of the project "League of Laughter" (1+1)
Since 2015, he has been the host of the program "Who Came to Sivokho?" on Radio P'yatnytsa.
During the 2019 presidential election, he actively supported Volodymyr Zelensky.
In 2019, he ran for the Servant of the People party (constituency No. 49, Kostyantynivka and Druzhkivka, Donetsk region), and took 3rd place.
From October 21, 2019 to March 2020, he was an advisor to the Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council on the reintegration and restoration of Donbas.
He initiated the creation of the "National Platform of Reconciliation and Unity", the presentation of which on March 12, 2020 was disrupted by veterans of the Russian-Ukrainian war.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

On March 12, 2020, veterans of the Russian-Ukrainian war disrupted the event of the then adviser to the Secretary of the National Security Council Serhiy Sivoho under the name "National Platform of Reconciliation and Unity" and expelled him from the "Parkovy" KEC. When leaving the hall, during the incident Sivoho lost his balance and ended up on the floor. Veterans of the "Azov" regiment were accused of this Serhiy Tamarin, Yuriy Kaplyu and Oleksandr Demydov. They are suspected of hooliganism under Part 4 of Article 296 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Azov veterans face up to 5 years in prison. Sivoho is formally the “victim”, it was against him that “hooligan acts with the use of cold and/or firearms” were allegedly committed. Simply put, it was he who ended up on the floor, for which Tamarin, Demidov and Kaplya were put on trial.

War veterans also sent a report to the Security Service of Ukraine about Sivokha's high treason, as he initiated the collaborationist event. According to the activists, any attempts to "establish dialogue" with representatives of the occupation administrations and individuals who contribute to the illegal occupation of the territory of Ukraine are high treason.

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

The information is being clarified

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

The information is being clarified

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

He did not file any declarations.

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

The information is being clarified

Scandals

Until 2014, he actively supported the Party of Regions and Viktor Yanukovych. He was the host of the Anti-Maidan rallies in 2014.
During the 2019 parliamentary campaign, the Kyiv PR company Pragmatico received orders to write comments on Facebook in support of Sivokho on behalf of bots.
On January 7, 2020, he participated in the telethon "Christmas. People instead of war. Children of Donbass", hosted by the pro-Russian TV channel 112 Ukraine.
He proposed involving the UOC (MP) to resolve the "conflict in Donbas."

Link

Facebook page

mass media about:

The Internet remembered Syvokho, how he "drowned" at the "Anti-Maidan" for Yanukovych

During the elections to the Council, comedian Sivokh was supported by bots on Facebook - investigation

War and peacemaking from the UOC (MP): what did the advisor to the NSDC Secretary Serhiy Syvokho not take into account?

Position:

Judge of the Military Judicial Board of the Supreme Court of Ukraine

Date and place of birth:

27.06.1963, p. Kirovo, Orihiv district, Zaporizhzhia region

Information about relatives:

Daughter Yana, son Anatoliy and son-in-law of the judge work in the prosecutor's office of the city of Kyiv. He has a judge Yemets and a suitor-prosecutor who works in the prosecutor's office of Zbaraz district of Ternopil region. In addition, the judge's nephew works as an operational officer of the Dnipro Police Department of the State Government of the Zaporizhzhya Region, and the niece is the secretary of the court session of the Communarsky District Court of the city of Zaporizhzhia. – declaration family ties.

Education:

Higher Investigative School of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

In 1993, he was elected a judge, and in 1998, he was appointed the head of the Energodar city court of the Zaporizhia region.

In 2003, by the Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Anatoly Yemets was elected a judge of the appeal court of the Zaporizhzhia region for an indefinite term, and in 2008, a judge of the Supreme Court of Ukraine.

After working in the Appellate Court of the Zaporizhzhia region, in 2008, Anatoly Yemts choose a judge of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, where he still works. In addition, Anatolii Yemets is a judge-speaker of the Supreme Court's Chamber of Economic Affairs. During the professional testing for the new Supreme Court, Mr. Yemets received 66 points. Taking into account 9 years of work experience in the Supreme Court and the minimum number of passing points in this test - 60, Anatoly Yemts' score can hardly be called high. – source Prosud

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

On August 31, 2020, at the entrance to the Maritime Court of Odesa, where the case was to be heard, Sternenko was attacked by two men who are related to the organizer of the third attack, Oleksandr Podobedov. At the meeting itself prosecutors of the Prosecutor's Office of Odesa, Ihor Ihorovych Pishchevyat and Neganova Olena Yevgeniivna submitted to the court a petition for the election of Sternenko as a preventive measure in the form of detention, although he did not violate the conditions of house arrest.

Due to the attack before the court, as well as in connection with the possible strengthening of the quarantine, Sternenko again appealed to the Supreme Court with a request to change the jurisdiction of the case to Kyiv, however, on September 8, 2020 panel of judges Olga Volodymyrivna Bilyk, Stanislav Ivanovich Kravchenko and Anatoliy Yemets denied this request. Sternenko's case continued to be heard in the Odessa court.

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

The information is being clarified.

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

The information is being clarified.

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

At least until the end of 2015 the judge's wife owned a house with an area of 467 square meters. m. in the village of Gora, Boryspilsky district, Kyiv region. According to the declaration, the judge's wife purchased this is a big house for less than UAH 2 million, and according to the latest estimate, it was worth less than a million. – source. Journalists also found an advertisement for the sale of this house. If the advertisement is to be believed, the judge is selling the estate, which contains 4 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, a living room with a fireplace, an attic floor with a kitchen, a Finnish sauna and a gym for 400 thousand dollars, which is almost 11 million UAH. A very interesting amount, considering the stated value of this house in the declaration for 2015.

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

The information is being clarified

Scandals

The information is being clarified.

Link

Declaration for 2023

mass media about:

https://prosud.info/blog/iemec_anatoliy_anatoliyovich

Supreme judges with assets worth millions complain about their salaries

An estate worth 11 million, an "unfinished" dacha and a brand new foreign car: how do the judges of the Supreme Court of Ukraine live

Judges of the Supreme Court have relatives in related bodies

Position:

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ukraine

Date and place of birth:

03/05/1967, village of Odintsi, Chernihiv district, Chernihiv region

Information about relatives:

Kravchenko Inna Alekseevna – wife, private notary (Kyiv City Notary District)

Kravchenko Kristina Stanislavivna – daughter

Education:

Yaroslav the Wise National Law University

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

He worked as an intern, and later as a judge, at the Kozeletsk District Court of the Chernihiv Region.

From August 2002 to May 2011, he was a judge of the Kyiv Court of Appeal.

On May 19, 2011, he was elected a judge of the High Specialized Court of Ukraine for Civil and Criminal Cases.

On April 23, 2014, he was appointed Deputy Chairman of this court.

By Presidential Decree of November 10, 2017, he was appointed a judge of the Criminal Court of Cassation within the Supreme Court, and on December 8, he headed this court.

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ukraine since May 26, 2023.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

Was on the panel of judges who decided to move the trial of Serhiy Sternenko from Kyiv to Odessa.

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

The information is being clarified

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

In 2003, he was a member of the panel of judges that changed the preventive measure for Oleksiy Pukach, who is currently convicted of the murder of Georgy Gongadze. As notes lawyer Roman Maselko, this decision allowed Oleksiy Pukach to escape and hide until July 2009.

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

When submitting declarations for 2012, 2013 and 2014, the judge did not indicate that he owned a 900 sq. m. land plot in the town of Kozelets. At the same time, this land plot was indicated in the declaration for 2015.

Considering the fact that the right to it, according to the 2015 declaration, was acquired on August 28, 2002, the fact that there is no information about the plot in the declarations for 2012, 2013, and 2014 allows us to assume that the information in the declarations for 2012, 2013, and 2014 is unreliable.

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

The information is being clarified

Scandals

As a member of the panel of judges, he was involved in the release from custody of Oleksiy Pukach, currently convicted of the murder of G. Gongadze.

Participated in the review of the case as part of a panel of judges, the decisions on which were the subject of consideration by the European Court of Human Rights (Case "A.V. v. Ukraine"). In its decision, the European Court found a violation of paragraph 1 and subparagraph "c" of paragraph 3 of Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

In 2011, Kravchenko was elected a judge of the High Specialized Court of Ukraine for Civil and Criminal Cases, and in 2014 he was appointed deputy chairman of this court. This court was considered the brainchild of Andriy Portnov, an odious associate of Viktor Yanukovych.

Undeclared property in declarations of different years (a 900 sq. m. plot of land in Kozelets and a house).

Link

CONCLUSION on the non-compliance of the candidate for the position of judge of the Supreme Court, Kravchenko Stanislav Ivanovych, with the criteria of integrity and professional ethics

Declaration for 2023

mass media about:

Who is Stanislav Kravchenko? Dossier on the new Chairman of the Supreme Court

Released Gongadze's killer: what is known about Stanislav Kravchenko, the new chairman of the Supreme Court

Position:

Judge of the Supreme Court

Date and place of birth:

The information is being clarified

Information about relatives:

Investigation project. Info "Judge's blood" indicates the following relatives of the judge: Mohylyna Olena Serhiivna (wife) - lawyer. She worked as the head of the sector of interaction with subjects of state registration and advanced training of state registrars of the State Registration Department of the Main Territorial Department of Justice in the Kirovohrad region. Oleg Olegovich Mohylnyi (son) – Kirovohrad Oblast Prosecutor's Office, Prosecutor of the Procedural Management Department of the Kirovohrad Oblast Prosecutor's Office. At the same time, the judge's declaration states that the son's name is Vladyslav Olegovich Mohylnyi. Serhiy Serhiyovych Chebotaryov (his wife's brother) is the head of the Kirovohrad Oblast Prosecutor's Office.

Education:

The information is being clarified.

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

He started working as a judge of the Kirovo District Court of the city of Kirovohrad in in 1997. WITH of 2013 worked as a judge of the Court of Appeal of the Kirovohrad region. December 25, 2014 was dismissed from this position in connection with the submission of a resignation letter. Since November 10, 2017, he has been a judge of the Supreme Court. On December 17, 2020, he was dismissed from his position due to his resignation.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

August 25, 2020 The Supreme Court consists of judges Serhiy Stanislavovych Slynko, Oleksandr Marchuk, Oleg Pavlovich Mohylny refused Sternenko to change the jurisdiction of the case and transfer it for consideration to one of the courts of Kyiv due to the presence of danger to Sternenko's life and health during the consideration of the case in Odesa.

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

The information is being clarified.

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

The information is being clarified.

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

The information is being clarified.

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

The information is being clarified

Scandals

On October 10, 2018, lawyer Yevgenia Zakrevska accused judges of the Supreme Court in the improper (protracted) cassation review of the verdict of the "titushkovodo" Yuriy Krysin. He is accused of murder of Vyacheslav Veremiy during the Maidan protests in 2014. Earlier, the Court of Appeal sentenced him to 5 years of imprisonment. Krysin admitted that he had something to do with the death of Veremiy. The judge-reporter was Mohylnyi Oleg Pavlovich, and the members of the collegium - Oleksandr Petrovych Marchuk and Serhiy Stanislavovych Slynko - also appear in "Pravotvorka" as prosecutors in politically motivated cases.

On September 10, 2019, the court left Krysin's sentence unchanged.

Link

Oleg Pavlovich Mohylny - family ties

https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/342/97#Text

https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/306-18#Text

https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/59-19#Text

Declaration for 2019

Declaration for 2020

mass media about:

The court refused to return Krysin to the pretrial detention center

Position:

Chairman of the Criminal Court of Cassation as part of the Supreme Court

Date and place of birth:

5.03.1977, city Lukiv, Turii district, Volyn region

Information about relatives:

According to the data declarations by family ties, the judge's father-in-law is Mykhailo Ivanovich Forkosh – former head of the Territorial Department of the State Judicial Administration in Zakarpattia Oblast.

Olena Mykhailivna Marchuk (wife of a judge) - from 2012 to 2015 worked in the bodies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine in Zakarpattia Oblast; from 2015 to 2016, she worked as a department inspector in the main board of the National Police in Zakarpattia region; since 2016, she has been working as an inspector of the department of monitoring and reporting of police activity of the information support and coordination department "102", about informs "HONEST" movement.

Education:

National Academy of Internal Affairs

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

2002-06 – judge of the Velikoberezny District Court of the Transcarpathian Region.
2006-08 – judge of the Uzhhorod City and District Court of the Transcarpathian Region.
2008-17 – judge of the Court of Appeal of the Zakarpattia region.
2017 – 2023 – judge of the Supreme Court of Ukraine

From June 19, 2023 to the present, the chairman of the Criminal Court of Cassation as part of the Supreme Court.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

The information is being clarified

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

The information is being clarified

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

The monetary assets of the declarant and family members for the current year amount to UAH 6,080,447.08, which is more than the sum of income and monetary assets of the previous year (UAH 5,266,726.80). The total cash of the declarant and family members in the declaration is 4,614,489.00 UAH The total value of movable and immovable property, as well as cash declared in the current declaration is UAH 5,518,328.00, which is 5.1679 times more than what was declared in the previous declaration (UAH 1,067,809.80). The number of children indicated in the declaration: 2, while the pep.org.ua register states: 3

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

The information is being clarified

Scandals

September 18, 2017 "DEJURE" foundation prepared list of unscrupulous candidates and conflicts of interests of the members of the VRP for today. As noted, candidate No. 44 Oleksandr Petrovych Marchuk has a conflict of interest with M. P. Hudyk. In 2007, Marchuk privatized an apartment he received as an official residence and sold it in 2010.

21.01.2020 disciplinary chamber of the High Council of Justice ofwill consider the complaint Dmytro Oleksandrovich Evralyov regarding the judges of the Criminal Court of Cassation as part of the Supreme Court Yakovleva Svitlana Volodymyrivna, Marchuk Oleksandr Petrovych, Nastavny Vyacheslav Volodymyrovych.

Link

The meeting of the VRP on January 21, 2020

Declaration for 2023