Position: judge of the Northern Commercial Court of Appeal. 

Date and place of birth: 22.09.1966, p. Prudky, Krasnogvardiy district, Belgorod region, Russian Federation. 

Information about relatives: 

Angela Yuriivna Korsak, wife - since 2004 - a private notary of the Kyiv City Notary District. 

Education: Ukrainian Law Academy named after Dzerzhinsky in Kharkiv. 

Information about work (when, where worked, in what positions):

1984 – worker of the green construction section of the improvement and auxiliary farms of the Alushta Territorial Council for the Management of Trade Union Resorts.
1984 – 1986 – military service in the Armed Forces of the USSR.
1987 – operator of the KNS of the Morskyi Bereg Boarding House.
1991 – 1992 – bailiff of the Yalta City People's Court.
1992 – 1993 – assistant to the chairman of the Yalta City People's Court.
1993 – 2002 – judge of the Yalta City Court.
2002 – 2009 – judge of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal.
2009 – 2010 – first deputy chairman, judge of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal.
2010 – 08.2011 – Deputy Chairman of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal.
2011 – 2012 – Chairman of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal.
2012 – judge of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal.
2012 – 2018 – judge of the Higher Economic Court of Ukraine.

2018 – 2019 – judge of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal.

Since October 2019, he has been a judge of the Northern Commercial Court of Appeal. 

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

Case "Kolomoiskyi v. Ukraine"

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

On December 9, 2020, the panel of judges of the Northern Commercial Court of Appeal actually resumed the proceedings regarding the cancellation of the nationalization of PrivatBank, the bank's press service reported.

Judges Vitaly Korsak, Olga Popikova and Oleksiy Yevsikov annulled the decision of the judge of the Kyiv Commercial Court Larisa Shkurdova dated October 16, 2019 to stop the proceedings in case No. 910/1834/19.

"The appellate instance, despite the violated deadlines for filing an appeal with one of the defendants in the case and the operation of the so-called "anti-Kolomoi" law, actually resumed the proceedings regarding the cancellation of the nationalization of PrivatBank. These are the consequences that may result from the further consideration of the case filed by Igor Kolomoiskyi and TRIANTAL INVESTMENTS LTD (a Cypriot company that owned one of the largest blocks of shares in PrivatBank before its nationalization and is owned by Kolomoiskyi and Bogolyubov) regarding the illegality of the PrivatBank purchase agreement and the demand for shares pending consideration of another the lawsuit of Ihor Kolomoisky — on the recognition of the illegal nationalization of PrivatBank, which is currently being considered by the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal (case No. 826/7432/17)," Privatbank said.

These judges, despite the violation of the deadlines for filing an appeal and the operation of the so-called "anti-Kolomoi" law, actually resumed the proceedings regarding the cancellation of the nationalization of PrivatBank.

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

In 2005, the judge of the Appellate State Court of Kyiv Korsak canceled the privatization of the Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant, whose shares were owned by the concern "Prydniprovya". The mass media wrote that the Privat group of Ihor Kolomoiskyi, which owned 25% of shares of NZF, would benefit from the cancellation of privatization. At that time, Judge Korsak participated in a press conference held by the "Privat" group. And the initiator of the cancellation of privatization through the court was the then Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, who played along with Privat. 

In May 2021, the Canadian company TIU Canada demanded the removal of Popikova, Korsak and Yevsikov of the judges of the Northern Court of Appeal. They are considering the case of illegal disconnection of the solar power plant from the networks of Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant JSC."

TIU Canada explained that judges Korsak, Popikova and Yevsikov previously ruled in favor of Igor Kolomoiskyi, who controls NZF, in the case against the state-owned Privatbank.

Therefore, foreigners assume that judges will not be able to objectively consider the case related to this. the company

The president of TIU Canada, Michael Yurkovich, quoted by the press service, believes that it is impossible to count on an impartial hearing of the case when the judges have a track record of decisions in favor of the oligarch who is under US sanctions.

In May, all three judges recused themselves.

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

The Public Integrity Council recognized Judge Korsak as not meeting the criteria of integrity and professional ethics, in particular, due to public comments in the case regarding the reprivatization of the "Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant" (now owned by Ihor Kolomoiskyi), false data in the application form of the Candidate for the position of judge of the Supreme Administrative Court, and also due to the fact that he was assigned by the investigation to the group of judges of the Higher Economic Court of Ukraine, on which the distribution of cases was carried out in violation of the procedure established by law.

Disciplinary sanctions:

Judge Korsak was assigned by the Department of Special Investigations of the General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine to the group of judges of the Higher Economic Court of Ukraine, which distributed cases in violation of the procedure established by law. 

On 08/22/2014, the Solomyanskyi District Court of the city of Kyiv collected from Korsak the arrears for housing and communal services in favor of PJSC "Kyivgaz". 

Scandals

In addition to public statements in the framework of the case regarding the reprivatization of the Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant, which could have been used by one of the parties, the judge confirmed the legality of the Kyiv City Council's transfer for development of the plot, which was located close to the UNESCO monument "Sophia of Kyiv". 

Link

Conclusion on non-compliance of the candidate with the criteria of integrity and professional ethics

Declaration for 2021

Declaration for 2022

Declaration for 2023

mass media about: 

The court resumed consideration of Kolomoiskyi's lawsuit to cancel the nationalization of PrivatBank

TIU Canada requests the removal of judges of the Northern Court of Appeal in the case of disconnection of the NZF of its SES

A Canadian investor sued Kolomoisky National Insurance Fund due to the shutdown of a solar power plant

Three judges recused themselves in the TIU Canada solar power plant shutdown case

Court without justice

"I count to three..."

https://chesnosud.org/candidate/korsak-vitaliy-antonovich

Position:

Judge of the Economic Court of Kyiv

Date and place of birth: 05/22/1980, Makiivka, Donetsk region

Information about relatives:

Valery Pavlovich Omelchenko, businessman, People's Deputy of Ukraine of the 7th convocation from the Party of Regions, voted for "dictatorship laws" on January 16, 2014.

Zharty Olga Vasylivna, sister - from 2011 to 2013. at. Deputy Chief of Kyiv Regional Customs. It is known that the elite car, which was owned by Olga, caused a loud accident with victims. The case was never brought to court.

Natalia Dzharty, mother is an English teacher.

Dzharty Vasyl Georgiyovych, father (deceased) - ex-head of the city of Makiivka, ex-deputy of the People's Republic of Ukraine, ex-minister of environmental protection, ex-head of the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Crimea, a person close to Viktor Yanukovych, in the 90s - a criminal authority, known by the nickname "Vasya-bita"

Education:

In 2002, she graduated from Donetsk National University.

Information about work (when, where you worked, in what positions):

2000-2002 – intern at the Donetsk Commercial Court, assistant judge of the Donetsk Commercial Court;

2002-2008 – assistant to the first deputy head of the Donetsk Commercial Court;

2008-2010 – judge of the Commercial Court of Donetsk region;

From 2010 to the present day, she is a judge of the Economic Court of Kyiv, in 2011-2014 she was the deputy head of the court.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

Case "Kolomoiskyi v. Ukraine"

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

On November 1, 2021, it settled the lawsuit of Revatis LLC, the ultimate beneficiary of which is Ihor Kolomoiskyi, against the state-owned PrivatBank, the Ministry of Finance, as well as the Individual Deposit Guarantee Fund, the National Bank, and the Cabinet of Ministers, and declared the contracts for the purchase and sale of PrivatBank shares invalid.

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

In April 2021, the Alley of Fallen ATO Soldiers in the park on General Zhmachenko Ave. (Dniprovsky district of the capital) was given over for development.

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

Jarty is almost the richest judge in Ukraine. According to the 2014-2020 declarations, the judge's assets exceeded his income by 10 times (most of the assets were probably acquired between 2010 and 2014). Prices for expensive accessories and cars, declared by the judge, are indicated below the market price, or not indicated at all.

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

No disciplinary sanctions were recorded.

Scandals

A connoisseur of expensive things and social parties, judge Dzharta was exposed in a number of scandalous episodes. According to the report of People's Deputy Volodymyr Aryev at one of the parties could probably use narcotic substances. In 2019, Andriy Bohdan Andriy Dovbenka was one of the guests at the wedding of the associate of the ex-chairman of the OP Zelenskyi Andriy Bohdan. Russian showman Semen Slepakov, who illegally visited the occupied Crimea, was also one of the guests. She and her husband visited the aggressor state several times during the war. Has apartments in occupied Crimea.

Link

Declaration of integrity and family ties for 2018 to date

Declaration for 2017

Declaration for 2018

Declaration for 2019

Declaration for 2020

Declaration for 2021

Declaration for 2022

Declaration for 2023

Facebook page - https://www.facebook.com/viktoriyadzharty

Media about:

Judge Dzharta decided to give the Alley of fallen ATO soldiers in the park on Zhmachenko for development

The judge of the Commercial Court of Kyiv sentenced Dzharty to a car worth more than two million

The court satisfied the lawsuit of Revatis LLC and declared the bail-in of PrivatBank shares invalid

Jarta's daughter and several ze-deputies: with whom Bohdan walked at the wedding in Saint-Tropez

They are just laughing at us - the daughter of the odious associate of Yanukovych, Victoria Dzharta, became the richest judge in the world

Position:

Judge of the Sixth Appeal Administrative Court of the city of Kyiv

Date and place of birth: 

04/24/1963, Vinkivtsi village, Khmelnytskyi region

Information about relatives:

Darya Anatolyivna Bozhuk is the daughter of a judge, a former judge of the Khmelnytskyi District Administrative Court, the Kyiv District Court of the City of Poltava, and an employee of the Economic Court of Kyiv

Education:

Moscow Law Institute (graduated in 1992)

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

1997 - 2008 – the arbitration court of Khmelnytskyi region;

2008 - 2010 - judge of the local district administrative court of the city of Kyiv;

2010 - 2018 - a judge of the Kyiv Appeal Administrative Court

Since 2018, he has been a judge of the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

The case of Sheremet

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

Left in force the illegal decision of the District Administrative Court of the city of Kyiv to cancel the disciplinary punishment of KNDISE experts who did the so-called "portrait-psychological examination" in the framework of the Sheremet case

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

Considered a complaint against the CEC's decision to cancel the registration of Oleksandr Kunytskyi, a candidate for deputy from the "Servant of the People" party, whom the CEC refused to register (the candidate had dual citizenship - Ukrainian and Israeli). During the review of the complaint, according to the judge, they tried to stimulate him, promising him a bonus if he made a decision in favor of Kunytskyi

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

He did not indicate who owns a number of large real estate objects (with an area of more than 300 square meters) specified in the declaration

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

April 24, 2019 The First Disciplinary Chamber of the High Council of Justice opened a disciplinary case against Anatoly Stepaniuk

Scandals

Featured in materials Anti-Corruption Center as one of the wealthiest judges, the source of whose property the judges could not explain

Link

Declaration for 2021

Declaration for 2022

Declaration for 2023

mass media about:

The judge who considered the case of the candidate from "Servant of the People" Kunytskyi received an SMS with thanks and a promise of a "prize"

Prince of Monaco in Ukrainian. How does judge Anatoly Stepaniuk live?

Position:

Judge of the Sixth Appeal Administrative Court of the city of Kyiv

Date and place of birth: 

The information is being clarified

Information about relatives:

Ruslan Viktorovych Gubskyi, the son of a judge, has been working as a lawyer at the Tatarov, Farynnyk, Golovko Bar Association since 2017, a law firm, one of the founders of which is the current Deputy Head of the Office of the President Oleg Tatarov

Education:

Donetsk State University

Career:

2003-2010 — as a judge of the Yasynuvat city-district court of the Donetsk region;

2009-2010 — in the position of deputy chairman of the Yasynuvatskyi city-district court of the Donetsk region;

2010-2015 — as a judge of the Donetsk Appeal Administrative Court;

since April 2015 — as a judge of the Kyiv Appeal Administrative Court;

since October 2018, she was transferred to the position of judge of the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal.

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

2003–2010 – judge of Yasynuvatsky district court of Donetsk region;

2010–2015 – judge of the Donetsk Appeal Administrative Court;

2015 – 2018 – judge of the Kyiv Appeal Administrative Court;

Since 2018, he has been a judge of the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

The case of Sheremet

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

Upheld the illegal decision of the District Administrative Court of the city of Kyiv regarding the cancellation of the disciplinary punishment of KNDISE experts who performed the so-called "portrait-psychological examination" in the framework of the Sheremet case

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

Considered a complaint against the CEC's decision to cancel the registration of Oleksandr Kunytskyi, a candidate for deputies from the "Servant of the People" party, whom the CEC refused to register (the candidate had dual citizenship - Ukrainian and Israeli).

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

The information is being clarified

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

The information is being clarified

Scandals

Was the presiding judge at the court session on December 19, 2018, when the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal refused the National Council for Television and Radio Broadcasting to grant its appeal and upheld the decision of the District Administrative Court of the city of Kyiv from October 17, which prohibits the National Council from denying five companies group "112 Ukraine" in the extension of their digital licenses.

Link

https://declarations.com.ua/declaration/nacp_81a3f2d5-47cd-4913-8295-6e2beb10d870

Declaration for 2023

mass media about:

For a decision in favor of the "Israeli" from the "Servant of the People" the judges were promised a "prize"

THE COURT REMAINED THE PROHIBITION ON NATRADA REFUSING THE EXTENSION OF DIGITAL LICENSES FOR "112 UKRAINE"

Position:

Judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv

Date and place of birth: 

The information is being clarified

Information about relatives:

The information is being clarified

Education:

Higher, Kyiv National University named after Taras Shevchenko

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

After finishing the university, he worked as a legal consultant in a night club, then, according to data PROSUD - assistant to Nina Karpachova (former Ombudsman and deputy).

1999-2006 – assistant judge of the Supreme Court of Ukraine.

Since 2006, he has been a judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

Involved in the so-called Sheremet case, the Sternenko self-defense case, and the Kolomoisky v. Ukraine case.

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case(s):

Obliged Privatbank to pay 350 billion UAH to Surkis' offshore firms.

According to Serhiy Sternenko, "The arsonist at the request of Portnov's lawyer and with the assistance of Avakov canceled the suspicion against Ivan Kuznetsov." Kuznetsov is one of the attackers of Serhiy, who died.

According to the lawyer Leonid Maslov (SENS Consulting), "starting from 10.08.2020 (automatic determination of the investigating judge) before the investigating judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv, Vyacheslav Valeriyovych Pidpaloy, there was case No. 757/34017/20-k, based on the complaint of Antonenko Andrii Serhiyovych (representative Galenchenko Vitaly Mykhailovych) on the inactivity of the investigator (prosecutor) and setting a deadline for reviewing the materials of the criminal proceedings. For 8 months, Mr. Pidpalyi DID NOT MAKE ANY DECISION in the case. This is evidenced by the data of the register of court decisions. After a complaint to the Prosecutor General's Office in April 2021, lawyer Galenchenko received a REFUSAL (dated 13.08.2020) to limit the prosecutor's time to review the defense materials with the motivation: the lawyer's notification about the opening of the materials to the prosecutor did not specify the time for the prosecutor's possible arrival for review. The formula "during working hours, having previously agreed on the time of familiarization with the lawyer Vitaly Galenchenko (phone)" was deliberately copied by us 1:1 from the same notification about the opening of materials by the prosecution. That is, "working hours, having previously agreed..." from investigator Byrk is a normal way of invitation, but not from the defense attorney.

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

In 2014, he removed the arrest from the accounts of the ex-head of the NBU Serhii Arbuzov. There were 200 million hryvnias in the accounts, as writes UP edition. The reason for removing the arrest from the accounts in the court decision is that Arbuzov was not notified of the suspicions.

He refused to satisfy the complaints of Prosecutor Serhiy Horbatyuk, who was investigating crimes against the participants of the Revolution of Dignity, against the actions of Deputy Prosecutor General Yuriy Stolyarchuk. At the same time, in violation of the law, he artificially delayed the consideration of the complaint.

As reported DeJure Foundation, the arsonist returned to ex-minister of agrarian policy Mykola Prysiazhnyuk almost 2 million dollars, which were seized during the search of his sister's house.

This judge is also known for ordering Privatbank to pay Hryhori and Ihor Surkis about UAH 10 billion, which they allegedly lost as a result of the bank's nationalization. By the way, the Surkis brothers are longtime partners of Viktor Medvedchuk.

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

He has expensive movable property, land plots, real estate in the capital and in the Kyiv region origin is not fully understood.

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

In 2016, criminal proceedings were opened against Pidpaly due to the fact of making a knowingly unjust decision (Article 375 of the Criminal Code). The fate of the proceedings is not known for sure, but there is reason to say that it was closed.

Scandals

In 2007 (during the second government of Viktor Yanukovych) signed the decision to search Yuriy Lutsenko's apartment within the framework of the criminal case about Lutsenko's abuse of his official position as Minister of Internal Affairs in 2005-2006.

In 2018, he gave permission to receive all phone call data and sms of investigative journalists Nataliya Sedletska (Schemes: corruption in details, Radio Svoboda) and Khrystyna Berdynskyi (Novoye Vremya). In the journalistic environment, it was assessed as an attack on freedom of speech.

Made a dubious decision in a civil dispute, ordering the defendant to pay the plaintiff more than UAH 56 million - almost UAH 51.6 million of the loan debt plus UAH 4.9 million in interest; at the same time, the examinations of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Security Service of Ukraine and the Ministry of Justice indicated that the defendant's signature under the loan agreement was forged, that is, the plaintiff, in whose favor the judge ruled, resorted to fraudulent actions.

Link

Declaration of income

Declaration for 2019

Declaration for 2020

Declaration for 2021

Declaration for 2022

Declaration for 2023

mass media about:

A dangerous precedent: how the Pechersk court violates the rights of Ukrainians

What is known about the judge Pidpaly, who is considering the preventive measure of Medvedchuk

What did they do to themselves: the judge of the Pechersk Court of the city of Kyiv Vyacheslav Pidpaly

Judge Pidpaly, who did not allow Medvedchuk to be imprisoned, was sent to the "Pravotvorets" base

Position:

Judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv

Date and place of birth: 

28.05.1985 - Alchevsk

Information about relatives:

The information is being clarified

Education:

2007 — Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts

2011 — Kyiv National University named after Taras Shevchenko

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

2013 – 2015 – judge of Alchevsk city court of Luhansk region;

April 7, 2015 - incl. - judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv.

*We remind you that since April 2014, Alchevsk was in the zone of the "Anti-terrorist operation in the East of Ukraine", and since June 2014 it was already under the control of the occupiers.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

"Fortuna" case;

The case against the participants of the March 20 action;

The case of Ihor Soloninka, a centurion of the 5th centurion of the Maidan Self-Defense;

The case of the murder of Sheremet.

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case(s):

She left without consideration the request of the defense side of Victoria Kotelenets "Fortuna" to change the preventive measure, leaving her under 24-hour house arrest. Later, another judge of the Pechersk Court reduced Victoria's remand, changing her from 24-hour house arrest to night-time house arrest.

Improperly informed the defense of activist Roman Ratushny about the time of the meeting regarding the motion of Roman's lawyers to recuse himself judge Kristina Konstantinova.

Having no legal grounds, she ordered the hearing of the petition regarding the seizure of the property of the centurion of the 5th centurion of the Maidan Self-Defense, veteran Ihor Soloninka (Ihor appears so far as a witness in the criminal proceedings for the murder of 13 Berkut fighters during the Revolution of Dignity) in closed session, expelling him from the hall press and people's deputies of Ukraine.

The defense side of Yulia Kuzmenko refused to challenge the judge Sergey Vovka, who chose Yulia as a preventive measure in the form of detention.

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

• Issued a court decision obliging the General Prosecutor's Office to stop the search for ex-Minister of Ecology, Regional Minister Mykola Zlochevskyi, who was suspected of serious corruption crimes.

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

She did not specify the price of an apartment in Kyiv.

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

Disciplinary action in the form of a warning - decision of the Second Disciplinary Chamber of the High Council of Justice

Scandals

• On July 10, 2015, in the absence of representatives of the prosecutor's office, the police and the case itself at the meeting, she removed the arrests from the "Metrograd" shopping center, the "Metropolis" shopping center and the "Rus" hotel, which were seized at the time by the Russian gang raiders of the ex-vice speaker of the State Duma of the Russian Federation Oleksandr Babakov.

• Considered the case of the "diamond prosecutor" Oleksandr Korniyets and on October 22, 2015 decided decision on the application of a preventive measure in the form of bail in the amount of 3 million hryvnias.

According to the data "Censor.net", the first deputy head of the Main Investigation Department of the GPU Volodymyr Shapakin and the deputy prosecutor of the Kyiv region Oleksandr Korniyets were detained on July 5, 2015 on suspicion of receiving a bribe in the amount of 3 million 150 thousand UAH. During the searches, $ 400,000 was seized from Shapakin, and a significant amount of jewelry, 65 diamonds and a Kalashnikov assault rifle were seized from Korniyets. Both detainees were notified of the suspicion of committing a crime, provided for in Part 4 of Article 368 of the Criminal Code (receiving a bribe).

• Decided decision on the selection of a preventive measure in the form of house arrest against the head of the Kyiv regional organization "Svoboda" Ihor Sabiya for the protest against the introduction of amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine regarding the consolidation of the separate status of Donbas, which took place under the building of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on August 31, 2015.

• Judge Shaputko ruled decision on the selection of a preventive measure in the form of detention without bail in respect of police officer Serhii Oliynyk, who on February 7, 2016, while on duty, pursued 4 boys on a BMW, as a result of which he opened fire and mortally wounded a 17-year-old offender - details

Link

Declaration for 2018to

Declaration for 2019

Declaration for 2020

Declaration for 2022

Declaration for 2023

mass media about:

The patrolman, who was accused of murdering a BMW passenger, is tried by a judge from the "DPR"

The court left the ATO veteran Kotelenets under house arrest

The court ordered the GPU to remove ex-minister Zlochevskyi from the wanted list

Sheremet's case: the court arrested volunteer Yulia Kuzmenko

The court left the ATO veteran Kotelenets under house arrest

Metropolitan Pavla's sentence will be passed by the judge who let drunk drivers go without punishment

This did not happen even under Yanukovych: Ukrainian courts make decisions in favor of Putin's oligarchs.

Position:

Judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv

Date and place of birth: 

04/12/1977, Severodonetsk, Luhansk region

Information about relatives:

Tarasyuk Anatoliy Vasyliovych (former husband) - from 2012 to 2016, an officer of the Security Service of Ukraine. – according to the declaration of family ties for 2012-2016

Anastasia Tarasyuk is a daughter who, according to information, voiced by Serhii Sternenko, recorded a video in which she declared that Crimea does not belong to Ukraine and stood up for the Russian propagandist singer "Basta"

Viktor Petrovych Kytsyuk (civilian) - from 2009 to 2012, judge of the Zhovtnevy District Court of Kharkiv, from 2012 to 2018, judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv
* During the Maidan, he persecuted protesters for traveling to Mezhihirya, for which he was accused of making deliberately unjust decisions.

Lyudmila Petrivna Kytsyuk (sister of civil husband) – 2010-2013 assistant judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv, 2013-2018 assistant to the head of the court of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv

Education:

National Law Academy of Ukraine named after Yaroslav the Wise

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

2003 - incl. - judge of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv (from 2009 was elected to the position of judge indefinitely).
* Appointed By decree President Leonid Kuchma

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

She sent under house arrest the participants of the action for Sternenko's birthday, aimed against political repression - activists Roman Ratushny, Oleksiy Bilkovsky and Serhiy Filimonov.

She refused Andrii Antonenko in temporary access to personal belongings.

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

She did not allow the questioning of witnesses from the side of the suspects, which violated the principles of fair trial and actually denied the suspects the right to proper defense.

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

In 2016, she illegally allowed a search to be conducted on an activist of Avtomaidan. There were no legal grounds for carrying out such actions - the text of the resolution did not contain any ties of the activist to the case under investigation.

Also, this judge kept secret the content of the original examination of the British "expert" Birch (this examination is one of the key "evidences" of the prosecution) in the Sheremet case, although there were no sufficient grounds for this.

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

She did not declare the value of the car, which it uses or which it owns.

Kristina Konstantinova during the war took 1.2 million hryvnias in debt.

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

The information is being clarified

Scandals

According to the De Jure Foundation, "according to SBU materials, judge Konstantinova helped the odious Maidan judge Viktor Kytsyuk hide from the investigation. It was to her apartment that Kytsyuk moved his belongings, funds and documents in order to prevent their arrest and seizure in the course of investigative actions."

• On January 13, 2015, the GPU investigator appealed to Judge Konstantinova with a request for permission to obtain information on Yanukovych's telephone connection with Russian subscribers. Thanks to this permission, the prosecutor's office hoped to identify persons who helped the fugitive president to leave the country. The judge scheduled the hearing only 10 days later - on January 23. And then, for unknown reasons, she postponed the consideration of the petition to February 2, 2015. When the prosecutor's office announced that such terms block the consideration of the case, Krystyna Eduardivna refused the request.

Link

Declaration for 2021

Declaration for 2022

Declaration for 2023

mass media about:

Judge Konstantinova, who sent Ratushny and Filimonov under house arrest, previously allowed searches of Avtomaidan activists

The scandalous daughter of judge Konstantinova was arrested for driving drunk

During the war, the judge of the Pechersk court, Konstantinova, received 1,000 hryvnias of financial support and borrowed 1.2 million hryvnias

THE DAUGHTER OF A KYIV JUDGE STANDED UP FOR BASTA AND CALLED UKRAINIANS "CAttle"

Position:	Judge of the Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv.
Date and place of birth:	The information is being clarified
Information about relatives:	Man Golub Yevhen Valentynovich, prosecutor of the Military Prosecutor's Office of the Central Region of the Kyiv Garrison.
Education:	Higher education, in 2002 she completed her studies at the Faculty of Law at the Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

From 2002 to 2008, she worked as a consultant and assistant judge in the Shevchenko District Court of Kyiv. In 2008, by Presidential Decree, she was appointed to the position of judge of the Shevchenko District Court. In 2013, she was elected to the position of judge of the Shevchenko District Court for an indefinite term.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

Presides over the jury trial in the so-called “Sheremet case.”

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

Over the past 4 months, as part of the consideration of the so-called “Sheremet case,” she has illegally scheduled closed-door sessions (Article 7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure). At the same time, she herself did not adhere to this regime, allowing journalists, operatives and investigators who are not related to the proceedings into the courtroom, but forbidding relatives and guarantors, including people's deputies of Ukraine, to be present. During the consideration of the case under her chairmanship, the norm of continuity of trial (Article 322 of the Code of Criminal Procedure) was also repeatedly violated.

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

In 2019, she dropped the suspicion against Andriy Portnov, the former deputy chief of staff of ex-President V. Yanukovych's administration, for threatening the prosecutor.

As reported NGO "Ukraine against the Arbitrariness of Officials", in 2020, Holub O. refused to disqualify Judge Shevchenkovskyi, Judge Trubnikov A.V. from considering the complaint under reference No. 3829/27 dated February 27, 2020, against the inaction of the head of the State Anti-Corruption Bureau, which was expressed in the failure to enter into the ERDR information on the application under reference No. 3806/21 dated February 21, 2020 about the offense committed by the judge of the High Anti-Corruption Court Moysak S.M.

According to activists, Judge Holub O.A. had to grant the application dated March 3, 2020 to disqualify Judge Trubnikov A.V. on the basis of existing norms of international law, which are mandatory for Ukraine to implement, in accordance with concluded interstate agreements.

Also, according to information "De Jure Foundations", in 2017, the judge chose a preventive measure for the son of People's Deputy Shufrych, who was suspected of violating traffic rules and causing serious bodily harm, - bail for the father and house arrest.

Also, for Holub, the indictment against former People's Deputy Mykola Martynenko, who is suspected of embezzling half a billion hryvnias, was returned to eliminate deficiencies.

Dishonesty

International experts have discoveredthat the judge did not declare the husband's car and the income from its sale.

The 2018 declaration indicates a real estate object (section 3) owned by the declarant or a family member on the right of ownership (Property Joint Ownership), while the date of acquisition of the right coincides with the reporting year, and the indicators of the value of the real estate on the date of acquisition of the right and on the date of the last assessment are not indicated or are equal to 0.

Due to numerous facts of questionable judicial decisions and dishonesty, Oksana Holub withdrew from the competition for the position of judge of the High Anti-Corruption Court.

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

In 2017, the NACP checked the judge for a conflict of interest in the case of Serhiy Nechyporenko, the former prosecutor of Shevchenkivskyi and Podilskyi districts, who was detained in November 2015 on suspicion of receiving a bribe of $150,000. Holub's husband was once Nechyporenko's assistant. The judge herself actively denied the existence of a conflict of interest.

Scandals

In January 2014, Judge Oksana Holub of the Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv banned a Euromaidan participant from driving for four months. The activist allegedly “failed to stop” at the request of the police. The Kyiv Court of Appeal later overturned this decision. Oksana Holub herself did not report this incident in her declaration of integrity, although this is required by law.

In January 2021, a judge acquitted dog hunter Svyatogor, who had become "famous" for his inhumane treatment of animals. Animal rights activists note that He is responsible for killing about 1,000 stray dogs..

During the hearing in the Sheremet case on March 23, 2021, she publicly disrespected the official greeting of the Armed Forces of Ukraine “Glory to Ukraine!”, stating that   "By saying the greeting "Glory to Ukraine!", you are disrupting the order in the meeting room. I remind you, this is not Maidan!".

Link

Declaration for 2018

Declaration for 2019

Declaration for 2020

Declaration for 2021

Declaration for 2022

Declaration for 2023

Media about:

NACP takes on judge in case of ex-prosecutor caught taking $150,000 bribe in "Schemes" investigation

WHICH OF THE CANDIDATES TO THE ANTI-CORRUPTION COURT HAD CONSIDERED CASES AGAINST MAIDAN?

Judge of Shevchenkivskyi Court Holub bought a new TOYOTA HIGHLANDER for 2 million UAH and took out 4 loans during the war

Court acquits three defendants in attack on Mustafa Nayem

Judge Oksana Holub was included in the “Lawmaker” database for disrespecting the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ “Glory to Ukraine” salute

Who is rushing to the Anti-Corruption Court? Activists have compiled a list of "unworthy"