{"id":495,"date":"2021-06-05T09:31:27","date_gmt":"2021-06-05T06:31:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pravotvorets.local\/news\/zasidannia-v-tak-zvaniy-spravi-sheremeta-prokurora-zlovyly-na-cherhoviy-brekhni\/"},"modified":"2021-06-05T09:31:27","modified_gmt":"2021-06-05T06:31:27","slug":"zasidannia-v-tak-zvaniy-spravi-sheremeta-prokurora-zlovyly-na-cherhoviy-brekhni","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pravotvorets.info\/en\/news\/zasidannia-v-tak-zvaniy-spravi-sheremeta-prokurora-zlovyly-na-cherhoviy-brekhni\/","title":{"rendered":"The hearing in the so-called Sheremet case: the prosecutor was caught in yet another lie"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This week, the Shevchenkivskyi District Court completed the study of volume 11 of the so-called Sheremet case and moved on to the study of volume 12. During the hearing, the court denied Andriy Antonenko the right to take walks in the fresh air (Andriy lives in an apartment with his family, so, accordingly, he currently has no opportunity to go outdoors).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">During the hearing, further falsifications and other violations by judges, prosecutors, and investigators in the case were revealed. The lawyer explains this in more detail <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/leonid.masl0v\">Leonid Maslov (Sense Consulting)<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&quot;The prosecutor presented &quot;evidence&quot; of Yana Dugar&#039;s Facebook review, which shows that she has a tattoo on her arm. And the &quot;spy&quot; does not have a tattoo. He commented on it like this: &quot;she could have covered it up.&quot;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The prosecutor presented a 2019 photo of Yana with Inna Hryshchenko, who, they say, \u201cis a defendant in another case.\u201d First, Inna is not yet a defendant, second, this is a violation of Art. 62 of the Constitution, and third, a violation of Art. 88 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which strictly prohibits the use of criminal records and other characterizing circumstances as evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The prosecutor presented as &quot;evidence&quot; the report of the examination of Yana Dugar&#039;s mobile phone, which recorded extraneous conversations of lawyers in another case, which has nothing to do with the murder of Sheremet. The prosecutor could not explain what they prove<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The &quot;spice&quot; of the meeting was the study of the &quot;masterpiece&quot; ruling of the judge of the Pechersk court, Pysanets, who allowed (attention) an unspecified circle of persons ... to hack Apple&#039;s servers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This &quot;masterpiece&quot; is called &quot;resolution on temporary access to things and documents by overcoming logical protection systems&quot;: <a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3c6iTgr\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3c6iTgr<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And the most interesting thing is that Tishin was caught cheating. During the study of volume 10, he lost a disk with telephone traffic under the protocol of examination of this disk. That is, he presented the protocol of examination of some disk, but the disk itself - not. When asked &quot;where is the disk?&quot; Tishin replied: &quot;in volume No. 12&quot;. He said, there will be more. And in volume No. 12 it turned out that there was no such disk. And then Tishin said that ... he no longer remembers what was there before and that is why he does not have No. 10 at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Photo: <a href=\"https:\/\/novynarnia.com\/2020\/12\/07\/rif-2\/\">Newsroom<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"> <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This week, the Shevchenkiv District Court completed the investigation of the 11th volume of the so-called Sheremet case and...<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":496,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"ub_ctt_via":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-495","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bez-katehorii"],"aioseo_notices":[],"featured_image_src":"https:\/\/pravotvorets.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/sud-andrij-antonenko-riff-07.12-prokuror.jpg","author_info":{"display_name":"admin","author_link":"https:\/\/pravotvorets.info\/en\/news\/author\/admin\/"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravotvorets.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/495","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravotvorets.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravotvorets.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravotvorets.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravotvorets.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=495"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/pravotvorets.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/495\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravotvorets.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/496"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravotvorets.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=495"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravotvorets.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=495"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravotvorets.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=495"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}