судді - Правотворець

Declaration before release

mass media about:

The SBU confirmed the presence of a Russian passport in the possession of judge Bohdan Lviv

Slimy fish: how the Prosecutor General's Office lets TOP bribe-takers out of their hands

Tomorrow, the Supreme Court may play into Kolomoisky's hand in the American cases against the oligarch

ANNOUNCEMENT – The Supreme Court may play into Kolomoisky's hand tomorrow in the American cases against the oligarch

DemSokira held the 20th anniversary action under the trial against Kolomoiskyi (PHOTO)

"Kolomoisky is not worth the price." The commercial court can cancel the nationalization of PrivatBank - mass media

"Wolves" and "lions" in sheep's clothing: why the reform of the judicial system is stalling

Another Kolomoiskyi company through the court canceled a 40 million hryvnia fine from AMCU for collusion at Ukrnafta auctions

How judges vote according to the instructions of the management: an audio recording of secret meetings has appeared

The deputy head of the Ukrainian Armed Forces influenced key appointments in the courts: an audio recording appeared

The judge, who called the violation of the law "good intentions", went to the new Supreme Court

https://bihus.info/sudda-so-nazvav-porusenna-zakonu-blagimi-namirami-proisov-u-novii-verhovnii-sud

Position: member of the High Council of Justice, judge of the Northern Commercial Court of Appeal

Date and place of birth: May 24, 1974, city of Rivne

Information about relatives:

There is no information about the judge's close relatives

Education:

Kyiv National University named after Taras Shevchenko

Information about work (when, where worked, in what positions):

1992 – 1993 – legal advisor of the Production and Commercial Enterprise "Olga", Rivne region.

1997 – 1998 – legal advisor of the Limited Liability Company "Manufacturing Enterprise "Ukravtobud" in Kyiv.

1999 – 2000 – responsible secretary of the judicial panel for review of decisions, resolutions, resolutions of the Supreme Arbitration Court of Ukraine.

2000 – 2002 – specialist of the 1st category of the secretariat of the board for the preparation of materials for supervisory proceedings of the Higher (arbitration) commercial court of Ukraine.

2002 – 2004 – assistant judge of the Higher Commercial Court of Ukraine.

2004 – 2008 – judge (from 04.2009 – indefinitely) of the Economic Court of Kyiv region.

2008 – 2011 – judge of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal.

2011 – 2018 – judge of the Higher Economic Court of Ukraine.

2018 – judge of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal (the court ceased operations on October 3, 2018).

In June 2019, it was transferred to the Northern Commercial Court of Appeal.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

Case "Kolomoiskyi v. Ukraine"

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

On December 9, 2020, the panel of judges of the Northern Commercial Court of Appeal actually resumed the proceedings regarding the cancellation of the nationalization of PrivatBank, the bank's press service reported.

Judges Vitaly Korsak, Olga Popikova and Oleksiy Yevsikov annulled the decision of the judge of the Kyiv Commercial Court Larisa Shkurdova dated October 16, 2019 to stop the proceedings in case No. 910/1834/19.

"The appellate instance, despite the violated deadlines for filing an appeal with one of the defendants in the case and the operation of the so-called "anti-Kolomoi" law, actually resumed the proceedings regarding the cancellation of the nationalization of PrivatBank. These are the consequences that may result from the further consideration of the case filed by Igor Kolomoiskyi and TRIANTAL INVESTMENTS LTD (a Cypriot company that owned one of the largest blocks of shares in PrivatBank before its nationalization and is owned by Kolomoiskyi and Bogolyubov) regarding the illegality of the PrivatBank purchase agreement and the demand for shares pending consideration of another the lawsuit of Ihor Kolomoisky — on the recognition of the illegal nationalization of PrivatBank, which is currently being considered by the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal (case No. 826/7432/17)," Privatbank said.

These judges, despite the violation of the deadlines for filing an appeal and the operation of the so-called "anti-Kolomoi" law, actually resumed the proceedings regarding the cancellation of the nationalization of PrivatBank.

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

In May 2021, the Canadian company TIU Canada demanded the removal of Popikova, Korsak and Yevsikov of the judges of the Northern Court of Appeal. They are considering the case of illegal disconnection of the solar power plant from the networks of JSC "Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant" (NZF)".

TIU Canada explained that judges Korsak, Popikova and Yevsikov previously ruled in favor of Igor Kolomoiskyi, who controls NZF, in the case against the state-owned PrivatBank.

Therefore, foreigners assume that judges will not be able to objectively consider the case related to this. the company

The president of TIU Canada, Michael Yurkovich, quoted by the press service, believes that it is impossible to count on an impartial hearing of the case when the judges have a track record of decisions in favor of the oligarch who is under US sanctions.

In May, all three judges recused themselves.

Disciplinary sanctions:

The information is being clarified.

Dishonesty

As reported by the Bigus.Declarations portal, the amount of monetary assets of the declarant (in particular, for 2016) and the family is 10+ times higher than the sum of all incomes of the declarant and the family.

Scandals

According to the rating CORRUPT.UA "Top 10 millionaire judges" for 2016, took the third place among the representatives of the judiciary, who declared the most cash, namely - UAH 6,899,725.

Link

The court resumed consideration of Kolomoiskyi's lawsuit to cancel the nationalization of PrivatBank

mass media about

TIU Canada requests the removal of judges of the Northern Court of Appeal in the case of disconnection of the NZF of its SES

A Canadian investor sued Kolomoisky National Insurance Fund due to the shutdown of a solar power plant

Three judges in the case concerning the disconnection of the NZF of the TIU Canada solar power plant have recused themselves

Position: judge of the Northern Commercial Court of Appeal.

Date and place of birth: September 17, 1968.

Information about relatives:

Fadeeva Vlasta Yuriivna, wife

Fadeeva Nina Mykolaivna, mother-in-law - from 2010 to 2014, a member of the Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine. Since 2015, he has been practicing law.

Education:

National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv State Pedagogical Institute of Foreign Languages, KNEU named after Hetman

Information about work (when, where worked, in what positions):

1993-2001 – held the positions of middle and senior management of the Main Department of the State Field Service.

2001-2004 – worked in various positions (specialist, assistant judge, head of the department for ensuring the work of the court chamber) in the Higher Commercial Court of Ukraine.

2004-2008 – judge of the Commercial Court of Kyiv.

2008-2011 – judge of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal (in 2009 elected indefinitely).

2011-2018 – judge of the Higher Economic Court of Ukraine (terminated on 15.12.2017) (2014-2018 deputy secretary of the First Judicial Chamber).

2018 – judge of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal (in 2018, the court was liquidated by presidential decree).

In October 2019, he was transferred to the Northern Commercial Court of Appeal.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

Case "Kolomoiskyi v. Ukraine"

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

TIU Canada explained that judges Korsak, Popikova and Yevsikov previously ruled in favor of Igor Kolomoiskyi, who controls NZF, in the case against the state-owned Privatbank.

Therefore, foreigners assume that judges will not be able to objectively consider the case related to this. the company

In May, all three judges recused themselves.

Disciplinary sanctions:

The information is being clarified.

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

The information is being clarified.

Scandals

In 2018, the judges of the Higher Economic Court who worked under the leadership of Viktor Tatkov, who was suspected of illegal interference in the automated case distribution system and wanted by the Prosecutor General's Office, entered the competition for the new Supreme Court.

"Schem" journalists found a decision from 2013, in which one of the parties to the process draws the attention of the then-presiding judge Yevsikov to the violation that the composition of judges of the appellate instance was not determined according to the rule - that is, with the help of a computer system. At that time, Yevsikov did not see this as a violation, referring to the decision of the judges at the meeting, which allowed bypassing the automatic distribution of cases.

The ex-judge himself, when asked by journalists if he knew that there was a system to bypass the automated distribution of cases in the High Commercial Court during the time of President Yanukovych, answered briefly: "There were no complaints from lawyers. (…) Understand, I also have a reputation."

In 2019, the Public Integrity Council published an opinion on the activities of the judge. He used family connections to make a career. In addition, the members of the State Administrative Court had questions about the judge's wealth. Members of the Council decided that Yevsikov does not meet the criteria of a judge who can work in the Supreme Court.

Link

Conclusion on non-compliance of the candidate with the criteria of integrity and professional ethics

The court resumed consideration of Kolomoiskyi's lawsuit to cancel the nationalization of PrivatBank

mass media about:

TIU Canada requests the removal of judges of the Northern Court of Appeal in the case of disconnection of the NZF of its SES

A Canadian investor sued Kolomoisky National Insurance Fund due to the shutdown of a solar power plant

Three judges recused themselves in the TIU Canada solar power plant shutdown case

https://chesnosud.org/candidate/yevsikov-oleksij-oleksandrovych

Judges who worked under the "Tatkov scheme" do not regret it, but they strive to get into the new Supreme Court - "Schemes"

Judges of the Supreme State Court turned out to be millionaires and owners of expensive real estate (photo of estates)

Position: judge of the Northern Commercial Court of Appeal.

Date and place of birth: 22.09.1966, p. Prudky, Krasnogvardiy district, Belgorod region, Russian Federation.

Information about relatives:

Angela Yuriivna Korsak, wife - since 2004 - a private notary of the Kyiv City Notary District.

Education: Ukrainian Law Academy named after Dzerzhinsky in Kharkiv.

Information about work (when, where worked, in what positions):

1984 – worker of the green construction section of the improvement and auxiliary farms of the Alushta Territorial Council for the Management of Trade Union Resorts.
1984 – 1986 – military service in the Armed Forces of the USSR.
1987 – operator of the KNS of the Morskyi Bereg Boarding House.
1991 – 1992 – bailiff of the Yalta City People's Court.
1992 – 1993 – assistant to the chairman of the Yalta City People's Court.
1993 – 2002 – judge of the Yalta City Court.
2002 – 2009 – judge of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal.
2009 – 2010 – first deputy chairman, judge of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal.
2010 – 08.2011 – Deputy Chairman of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal.
2011 – 2012 – Chairman of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal.
2012 – judge of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal.
2012 – 2018 – judge of the Higher Economic Court of Ukraine.

2018 – 2019 – judge of the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal.

Since October 2019, he has been a judge of the Northern Commercial Court of Appeal.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

Case "Kolomoiskyi v. Ukraine"

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

In 2005, the judge of the Appellate State Court of Kyiv Korsak canceled the privatization of the Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant, whose shares were owned by the concern "Prydniprovya". The mass media wrote that the Privat group of Ihor Kolomoiskyi, which owned 25% of shares of NZF, would benefit from the cancellation of privatization. At that time, Judge Korsak participated in a press conference held by the "Privat" group. And the initiator of the cancellation of privatization through the court was the then Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, who played along with Privat.

TIU Canada explained that judges Korsak, Popikova and Yevsikov previously ruled in favor of Igor Kolomoiskyi, who controls NZF, in the case against the state-owned Privatbank.

Therefore, foreigners assume that judges will not be able to objectively consider the case related to this. the company

In May, all three judges recused themselves.

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

The Public Integrity Council recognized Judge Korsak as not meeting the criteria of integrity and professional ethics, in particular, due to public comments in the case regarding the reprivatization of the "Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant" (now owned by Ihor Kolomoiskyi), false data in the application form of the Candidate for the position of judge of the Supreme Administrative Court, and also due to the fact that he was assigned by the investigation to the group of judges of the Higher Economic Court of Ukraine, on which the distribution of cases was carried out in violation of the procedure established by law.

Disciplinary sanctions:

Judge Korsak was assigned by the Department of Special Investigations of the General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine to the group of judges of the Higher Economic Court of Ukraine, which distributed cases in violation of the procedure established by law.

On 08/22/2014, the Solomyanskyi District Court of the city of Kyiv collected from Korsak the arrears for housing and communal services in favor of PJSC "Kyivgaz".

Scandals

In addition to public statements in the framework of the case regarding the reprivatization of the Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant, which could have been used by one of the parties, the judge confirmed the legality of the Kyiv City Council's transfer for development of the plot, which was located close to the UNESCO monument "Sophia of Kyiv".

Link

Conclusion on non-compliance of the candidate with the criteria of integrity and professional ethics

The court resumed consideration of Kolomoiskyi's lawsuit to cancel the nationalization of PrivatBank

mass media about:

TIU Canada requests the removal of judges of the Northern Court of Appeal in the case of disconnection of the NZF of its SES

A Canadian investor sued Kolomoisky National Insurance Fund due to the shutdown of a solar power plant

Three judges recused themselves in the TIU Canada solar power plant shutdown case

Court without justice

"I count to three..."

https://chesnosud.org/candidate/korsak-vitaliy-antonovich

Position:

Judge of the Economic Court of Kyiv

Date and place of birth: 05/22/1980, Makiivka, Donetsk region

Information about relatives:

Valery Pavlovich Omelchenko, businessman, People's Deputy of Ukraine of the 7th convocation from the Party of Regions, voted for "dictatorship laws" on January 16, 2014.

Zharty Olga Vasylivna, sister - from 2011 to 2013. at. Deputy Chief of Kyiv Regional Customs. It is known that the elite car, which was owned by Olga, caused a loud accident with victims. The case was never brought to court.

Natalia Dzharty, mother is an English teacher.

Dzharty Vasyl Georgiyovych, father (deceased) - ex-head of the city of Makiivka, ex-deputy of the People's Republic of Ukraine, ex-minister of environmental protection, ex-head of the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Crimea, a person close to Viktor Yanukovych, in the 90s - a criminal authority, known by the nickname "Vasya-bita"

Education:

In 2002, she graduated from Donetsk National University.

Information about work (when, where you worked, in what positions):

2000-2002 – intern at the Donetsk Commercial Court, assistant judge of the Donetsk Commercial Court;

2002-2008 – assistant to the first deputy head of the Donetsk Commercial Court;

2008-2010 – judge of the Commercial Court of Donetsk region;

From 2010 to the present day, she is a judge of the Economic Court of Kyiv, in 2011-2014 she was the deputy head of the court.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

Case "Kolomoiskyi v. Ukraine"

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

On November 1, 2021, it settled the lawsuit of Revatis LLC, the ultimate beneficiary of which is Ihor Kolomoiskyi, against the state-owned PrivatBank, the Ministry of Finance, as well as the Individual Deposit Guarantee Fund, the National Bank, and the Cabinet of Ministers, and declared the contracts for the purchase and sale of PrivatBank shares invalid.

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

In April 2021, the Alley of Fallen ATO Soldiers in the park on General Zhmachenko Ave. (Dniprovsky district of the capital) was given over for development.

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

Jarty is almost the richest judge in Ukraine. According to the 2014-2020 declarations, the judge's assets exceeded his income by 10 times (most of the assets were probably acquired between 2010 and 2014). Prices for expensive accessories and cars, declared by the judge, are indicated below the market price, or not indicated at all.

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

No disciplinary sanctions were recorded.

Scandals

A connoisseur of expensive things and social parties, judge Dzharta was exposed in a number of scandalous episodes. According to the report of People's Deputy Volodymyr Aryev at one of the parties could probably use narcotic substances. In 2019, Andriy Bohdan Andriy Dovbenka was one of the guests at the wedding of the associate of the ex-chairman of the OP Zelenskyi Andriy Bohdan. Russian showman Semen Slepakov, who illegally visited the occupied Crimea, was also one of the guests. She and her husband visited the aggressor state several times during the war. Has apartments in occupied Crimea.

Link

Declaration of integrity and family ties for 2018 to date

Facebook page - https://www.facebook.com/viktoriyadzharty

Media about:

Judge Dzharta decided to give the Alley of fallen ATO soldiers in the park on Zhmachenko for development

The judge of the Commercial Court of Kyiv sentenced Dzharty to a car worth more than two million

The court satisfied the lawsuit of Revatis LLC and declared the bail-in of PrivatBank shares invalid

Jarta's daughter and several ze-deputies: with whom Bohdan walked at the wedding in Saint-Tropez

They are just laughing at us - the daughter of the odious associate of Yanukovych, Victoria Dzharta, became the richest judge in the world

Position:

Judge of the October District Court of Zaporizhzhia

Date and place of birth:

The information is being clarified

Information about relatives:

Kuzmin Yevhen Oleksandrovych (brother) - from 2014 to incl. works as a managing attorney at the Kuzmin and Partners Law Office; from 2007 to 2014 engaged in individual advocacy.

Education:

Yaroslav the Wise National Law Academy, Kharkiv

Information about work (when, where worked, in what positions):

2005-2007 – judge of the Dokuchayevsky city court of the Donetsk region;

2007-2015 – judge of the Proletarian District Court of the city of Donetsk (in 2015, she was elected to the position of judge indefinitely);

2015 - incl. - judge of the Zhovtnevy district court of the city of Zaporizhzhia.

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

She refused to order a preventive measure in the form of detention against the former head of the police of the Zaporizhia region, Volodymyr Serba, who led the dispersal of the Zaporizhia Euromaidan in January 2014. During the court session, he publicly called the participants of the Revolution of Dignity Serba "violators of law and order."

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

The information is being clarified

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

On January 28, 2019, under No. 209/2dp/15-19, the Second Disciplinary Chamber of the High Council of Justice decided to open a disciplinary case against judges of the Zhovtnevy District Court of the city of Zaporizhzhia Pivovarova Yulia Oleksandrivna, Antonenko Maksym Volodymyrovych, Zhukova Olga Yevgeniyvna and judges of the Zaporizhzhya Oblast Court of Appeal Rassuzhday Vadim Yakovych, Vyacheslav Mykolayovych Bilokonev (now a judge of the Zaporizhzhya Court of Appeal), Oleksandr Serhiyovych Honchar. (http://www.vru.gov.ua/content/act/209_28.01_.2019_.doc ).

Scandals

The information is being clarified

Link

http://www.vru.gov.ua/act/17160

mass media about:

The return of Serbia. How is the case of the Zaporizhia militia officer accused of dispersing the local Maidan

The court in Zaporizhzhia released an ex-militiaman accused of dispersing the local Maidan. He was wanted for seven years

A judge from Zaporizhzhia declared a third of a million hryvnias of salary and real estate in Donetsk

Zaporizhzhia courts will be massively replenished with personnel from Donbas

Donetsk judge Pivovarova sets her own rules in Zaporizhzhia

Position:

Judge of the Sixth Appeal Administrative Court of the city of Kyiv

Date and place of birth:

04/24/1963, Vinkivtsi village, Khmelnytskyi region

Information about relatives:

Darya Anatolyivna Bozhuk is the daughter of a judge, a former judge of the Khmelnytskyi District Administrative Court, the Kyiv District Court of the City of Poltava, and an employee of the Economic Court of Kyiv

Education:

Moscow Law Institute (graduated in 1992)

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

1997 - 2008 – the arbitration court of Khmelnytskyi region;

2008 - 2010 - judge of the local district administrative court of the city of Kyiv;

2010 - 2018 - a judge of the Kyiv Appeal Administrative Court

Since 2018, he has been a judge of the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

The case of Sheremet

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

Left in force the illegal decision of the District Administrative Court of the city of Kyiv to cancel the disciplinary punishment of KNDISE experts who did the so-called "portrait-psychological examination" in the framework of the Sheremet case

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

Considered a complaint against the CEC's decision to cancel the registration of Oleksandr Kunytskyi, a candidate for deputy from the "Servant of the People" party, whom the CEC refused to register (the candidate had dual citizenship - Ukrainian and Israeli). During the review of the complaint, according to the judge, they tried to stimulate him, promising him a bonus if he made a decision in favor of Kunytskyi

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

He did not indicate who owns a number of large real estate objects (with an area of more than 300 square meters) specified in the declaration

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

April 24, 2019 The First Disciplinary Chamber of the High Council of Justice opened a disciplinary case against Anatoly Stepaniuk

Scandals

Featured in materials Anti-Corruption Center as one of the wealthiest judges, the source of whose property the judges could not explain

Link

The judge who considered the case of the candidate from "Servant of the People" Kunytskyi received an SMS with thanks and a promise of a "prize"

mass media about:

Prince of Monaco in Ukrainian. How does judge Anatoly Stepaniuk live?

Position:

Judge of the Sixth Appeal Administrative Court of the city of Kyiv

Date and place of birth:

The information is being clarified

Information about relatives:

Ruslan Viktorovych Gubskyi, the son of a judge, has been working as a lawyer at the Tatarov, Farynnyk, Golovko Bar Association since 2017, a law firm, one of the founders of which is the current Deputy Head of the Office of the President Oleg Tatarov

Education:

Donetsk State University

Career:

2003-2010 — as a judge of the Yasynuvat city-district court of the Donetsk region;

2009-2010 — in the position of deputy chairman of the Yasynuvatskyi city-district court of the Donetsk region;

2010-2015 — as a judge of the Donetsk Appeal Administrative Court;

since April 2015 — as a judge of the Kyiv Appeal Administrative Court;

since October 2018, she was transferred to the position of judge of the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal.

Information about work (when, where he worked, in what positions):

2003–2010 – judge of Yasynuvatsky district court of Donetsk region;

2010–2015 – judge of the Donetsk Appeal Administrative Court;

2015 – 2018 – judge of the Kyiv Appeal Administrative Court;

Since 2018, he has been a judge of the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal

Involvement in one of the cases (which case, position at the time of involvement):

The case of Sheremet

Violation of legislation within the framework of the case:

Upheld the illegal decision of the District Administrative Court of the city of Kyiv regarding the cancellation of the disciplinary punishment of KNDISE experts who performed the so-called "portrait-psychological examination" in the framework of the Sheremet case

Involvement in other cases that had public resonance (in which case was noticed, status within this case, year, month):

Considered a complaint against the CEC's decision to cancel the registration of Oleksandr Kunytskyi, a candidate for deputies from the "Servant of the People" party, whom the CEC refused to register (the candidate had dual citizenship - Ukrainian and Israeli).

Dishonesty

(presence of circumstances indicating a probable violation by the pursuer of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption"):

The information is being clarified

Disciplinary sanctions and punishments:

The information is being clarified

Scandals

Was the presiding judge at the court session on December 19, 2018, when the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal refused the National Council for Television and Radio Broadcasting to grant its appeal and upheld the decision of the District Administrative Court of the city of Kyiv from October 17, which prohibits the National Council from denying five companies group "112 Ukraine" in the extension of their digital licenses.

Link

https://declarations.com.ua/declaration/nacp_81a3f2d5-47cd-4913-8295-6e2beb10d870