The extension of the preventive measure was considered by judge Mykhailo Yushkov, temporarily seconded by the High Council of Justice to the Pechersk District Court.
The court's decision regarding the change to personal commitment during the consideration of the so-called crime under Art. 111-2 (assistance to the aggressor state) is unique, it is another confirmation of the absurdity of the case itself and the importance of tireless and consistent struggle for the right.
We will remind that in this case, an ordinary advertising agency became a target for another law-enforcement fraud.
The agency, which specializes in promotion in social networks and Google, since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, has joined in helping to distribute materials on the territory of the Russian Federation as part of information and psychological operations (IPSO). In particular, about the crimes of the Russian troops against the civilian population, the losses of Russians as a result of the war and calls to boycott mobilization in the Russian army and go to rallies, undermining trust in the command and leadership of the aggressor state. Including helping with the collection of contacts of citizens of the aggressor country in the format of phishing and scams. With a logical purpose — the assignment of financial losses.
The main executors of the case, investigator Yevhenii Polupan and prosecutor Andrian Lupu, and their leaders Maksym Tsutskiridze and Ihor Mustetsa care about the national security of which country? After all, after they could not accuse him of fraud, they reclassified him to Art. 111-2 KKU. It seems that imposing financial losses on the citizens of the Russian Federation is a detriment to the national security of Ukraine.
*T.z. support of the Russian Federation, according to prosecutors, consisted in paying for phishing advertisements)
